Re: struct page vs page_link

Hi Mark, After Bark posted an BUG() when CONFIG_DEBUG_SG was used with LIO-Target, I add the proper usage of sg_table_init() and sg_mark_end() in the LIO-Target SE. Please update your case (if you are not doing it already). Here are my new changes for those who are still updating drivers to use

Re: struct page vs page_link

Thanks for that information, I analysed your code to get a better understanding of exactly what was going on and was able to successfully patch what I needed to. http://www.tuttleresearch.com/80211patch.html Much appreciated, Mark Tuttle On 2/9/08, Nicholas A. Bellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: struct page vs page_link

On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 01:28 -0500, Mark Tuttle wrote: > Regarding: > commit 18dabf473e15850c0dbc8ff13ac1e2806d542c15 > > This actually breaks the 802.11 subsystem (http://80211.sf.net) which > relies on the page struct. (ieee80211_crypt_wep.c, line 190) Can > anyone suggest an alternative kernel f

struct page vs page_link

Regarding: commit 18dabf473e15850c0dbc8ff13ac1e2806d542c15 This actually breaks the 802.11 subsystem (http://80211.sf.net) which relies on the page struct. (ieee80211_crypt_wep.c, line 190) Can anyone suggest an alternative kernel function or method? As of 2.6.24, the 802.11 subsystem cannot compi