[OT] Re: shared memory problem

2001-07-03 Thread Erik Mouw
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:49:24AM -0600, Blesson Paul wrote: > I have some confusion regarding key in shmget(). Let I > have two shared memory variables. For the first one, I put key "99" and the > size is 1024. Next, I put key "199" for the second variable and size 1024. >

shared memory problem

2001-07-03 Thread Blesson Paul
hi I have some confusion regarding key in shmget(). Let I have two shared memory variables. For the first one, I put key "99" and the size is 1024. Next, I put key "199" for the second variable and size 1024. Will the two shared memory area overwrite each other. How can I gur

Re: shared memory problem

2001-02-13 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Admin, On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Admin Mailing Lists wrote: > > I've been using the 2.2.x series successfully, latest i used was > 2.2.19pre7. Today i upgraded to 2.4.1-ac9 and noticed that shared > memory shows 0. I searched the list archive briefly and someone > said the stats have been broken

shared memory problem

2001-02-12 Thread Admin Mailing Lists
I've been using the 2.2.x series successfully, latest i used was 2.2.19pre7. Today i upgraded to 2.4.1-ac9 and noticed that shared memory shows 0. I searched the list archive briefly and someone said the stats have been broken since sometime in 2.3, but my system also shows my swap being used up