Re: seccomp for 2.6.11-rc4

2005-02-17 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 06:25:03AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > hmm, just an idea, but have you thought about using > an indirect syscall table for your purposes? > > current->syscall_table > > and have a table for every 'mode' you want to use ... That would add an additional level of indire

Re: seccomp for 2.6.11-rc4

2005-02-15 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:32:44AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Hello, > > This is the latest version against 2.6.11-rc4: > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.6/2.6.11-rc4/seccomp > > I'd need it merged into mainline at some point, unless anybody has >

seccomp for 2.6.11-rc4

2005-02-15 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
Hello, This is the latest version against 2.6.11-rc4: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.6/2.6.11-rc4/seccomp I'd need it merged into mainline at some point, unless anybody has strong arguments against it. All I can guarantee here, is that I'll back it out m