t;> >
> >> > Thanks god get response from your side finally :)
> >> > I get qla2xxx-upstr...@qlogic.com from the maintainer
> information of driver/scsi/qla2xxx
> >> > Looks like it should be modified.
> >> >
>> Sorry for delay. I do try to respond quickly to any emails received on
>> that ID as well.
>>
>> We’ll keep it for now and I’ll look into updating it, if needed.
>>
>> > Thanks
>> > Jianchao
>> >
>> &
jianchao.wang [mailto:jianchao.w.w...@oracle.com]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 6:51 PM
> >>> To: Dept-Eng QLA2xxx Upstream ; Madhani,
> >>> Himanshu ; jthumsh...@suse.de
> >>> Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
; Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>> j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; Martin K. Petersen ;
>> Junxiao Bi
>> Subject: Re: BUG: scsi/qla2xxx: BUG_ON(blk_queued_rq(req) is triggered in
>> blk_finish_request
>>
>> Would anyone please take a lo
Would anyone please take a look at this ?
Thanks in advance
Jianchao
On 05/23/2018 11:55 AM, jianchao.wang wrote:
>
>
> Hi all
>
> Our customer met a panic triggered by BUG_ON in blk_finish_request.
>>From the dmesg log, the BUG_ON was triggered after command abort occurred
>>many times.
> Th
Hi all
Our customer met a panic triggered by BUG_ON in blk_finish_request.
>From the dmesg log, the BUG_ON was triggered after command abort occurred many
>times.
There is a race condition in the following scenario.
cpu A cpu B
kworker
6 matches
Mail list logo
