On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 02:26 -0400, Jon Ringle wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 22:55 -0400, Jon Ringle wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >> Out of these two, the first one that is showing "in_atomic():1" seems
> >> more likely to me to be a potential cause of the "scheduling whi
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 22:55 -0400, Jon Ringle wrote:
Hello,
Out of these two, the first one that is showing "in_atomic():1" seems
more likely to me to be a potential cause of the "scheduling while
atomic" dump.
Does this logic seem reasonable? Are there other debuggin
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 22:55 -0400, Jon Ringle wrote:
> Hello,
> Out of these two, the first one that is showing "in_atomic():1" seems
> more likely to me to be a potential cause of the "scheduling while
> atomic" dump.
>
> Does this logic seem reasonable? Are there other debugging techniques I
> c
Hello,
I am sometimes getting the following "scheduling while atomic" dump:
[42949427.37] scheduling while atomic: sh/0x0002/144
[42949427.38] [] (dump_stack+0x0/0x14) from []
(schedule+0x628/0x6c8)
[42949427.39] [] (schedule+0x0/0x6c8) from []
(__down_read+0xc4/0x128)
[42949427.4
4 matches
Mail list logo
