Re: sched_test_yield benchmark

2001-01-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Friday 19 January 2001 07:59, Bill Hartner wrote: > Just a couple of notes on the sched_test_yield benchmark. > I posted it to the mailing list in Dec. I have a todo to get > a home for it. There are some issues though. See below. > > (1) Beware of the changes in sys_sched_yi

Re: [Lse-tech] sched_test_yield benchmark

2001-01-19 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:30:55AM -0500, Bill Hartner wrote: > (3) For the i386 arch : > > My observations were made on an 8-way 550 Mhz PIII Xeon 2MB L2 cache. > > The task structures are page aligned. So when running the benchmark > you may see what I *suspect* are L1/L2 cache ef

sched_test_yield benchmark

2001-01-19 Thread Bill Hartner
Just a couple of notes on the sched_test_yield benchmark. I posted it to the mailing list in Dec. I have a todo to get a home for it. There are some issues though. See below. (1) Beware of the changes in sys_sched_yield() for 2.4.0. Depending on how many processors on the test system and