Re: sched /HT processor

2005-04-03 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 04:22 +0530, Arun Srinivas wrote: > Thanks. yes, a reschedule may not take place after a ms, if the currently > running task cannot be preempted by another task. > > (1) But, can a reschedule happen within a millisec (or once a process is > scheduled can schedule() be calle

Re: sched /HT processor

2005-04-03 Thread Arun Srinivas
CTED]> CC: Arun Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,LKML Subject: Re: sched /HT processor Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:31:03 -0400 On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 13:17 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > A reschedule can happen once every ms, but also upon returning to > userspace and when

Re: sched /HT processor

2005-04-03 Thread Arun Srinivas
From: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Arun Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,LKML Subject: Re: sched /HT processor Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:31:03 -0400 On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 13:17 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > A reschedule

Re: sched /HT processor

2005-04-03 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 13:17 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > A reschedule can happen once every ms, but also upon returning to > userspace and when returning from an interrupt handler, and also when > something in the kernel explicitly calls schedule() or sleeps (which in > turn results in a call

Re: sched /HT processor

2005-04-03 Thread Jesper Juhl
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Arun Srinivas wrote: > > I looked at my "include/asm-i386/param.h" and the HZ value is 1000.So, I > suppose the timer interrupt frequency is 1000 times per sec. or once every 1 > millisec. > > So, is scheduler_tick() ( for resceduling) called only once every 1 ms?? I am > mea

Re: sched /HT processor

2005-04-02 Thread Arun Srinivas
e argument correct? Thanks From: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Arun Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: LKML Subject: Re: sched /HT processor Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 20:17:54 -0500 On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 06:07 +0530, Arun Srinivas wrote: > HI > > I have pentium4 hyperthreaded pr

Re: sched /HT processor

2005-04-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 07:46 +0530, Arun Srinivas wrote: > I attached the 'dmesg' output because there it shows that my kernel > recogonized 2 cpu's.As said earlier , are they treated as 2 physical cpu's > or logical cpu's? > As I said, they are logical [snip] > > > available > > > Apr 2 17:4

Re: sched /HT processor

2005-04-02 Thread Arun Srinivas
I attached the 'dmesg' output because there it shows that my kernel recogonized 2 cpu's.As said earlier , are they treated as 2 physical cpu's or logical cpu's? From: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Arun Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: LKML Subje

Re: sched /HT processor

2005-04-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 06:07 +0530, Arun Srinivas wrote: > HI > > I have pentium4 hyperthreaded processor.I am using kernel 2.6.5 and i > rebuilt my kernel with CONFIG_SMP enabled (in this kernel source there is > nothing such as CONFIG_SMT...i noticed this only in recent 2.6.11). > I don't hav

sched /HT processor

2005-04-02 Thread Arun Srinivas
HI I have pentium4 hyperthreaded processor.I am using kernel 2.6.5 and i rebuilt my kernel with CONFIG_SMP enabled (in this kernel source there is nothing such as CONFIG_SMT...i noticed this only in recent 2.6.11). 1) So, after I rebulit it with CONFIG_SMP enabled does linux recogonize my mach