Re: rseq event_counter field

2017-10-30 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- On Oct 30, 2017, at 2:08 PM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Answering both emails here. >> >> Also, welcome Kyle. Kyle, how badly does rseq's proposed >> event_counter break rr? For that matter, how badly does rseq without >

Re: rseq event_counter field

2017-10-30 Thread Kyle Huey
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Answering both emails here. > > Also, welcome Kyle. Kyle, how badly does rseq's proposed > event_counter break rr? For that matter, how badly does rseq without > an event_counter break rr? > > (Linus, if you care, I'm proposing that rseq

Re: rseq event_counter field

2017-10-28 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- On Oct 28, 2017, at 10:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org wrote: > Answering both emails here. > > Also, welcome Kyle. Kyle, how badly does rseq's proposed > event_counter break rr? For that matter, how badly does rseq without > an event_counter break rr? > > (Linus, if you care, I'm

Re: rseq event_counter field

2017-10-28 Thread Andy Lutomirski
Answering both emails here. Also, welcome Kyle. Kyle, how badly does rseq's proposed event_counter break rr? For that matter, how badly does rseq without an event_counter break rr? (Linus, if you care, I'm proposing that rseq is probably fine for 4.15, but that it should be merged without the e