Re: request for information about the "ath5k" licensing

2007-09-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
Reyk Floeter wrote: I'm still waiting for an answer. Your process is taking too long. Speaking as a person through which these changes flow upstream into the official kernel (ath5k maintainers -> linville -> me -> linus)... The most important thing for today is that no ath5k stuff has been

Re: request for information about the "ath5k" licensing

2007-09-06 Thread Reyk Floeter
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 01:00:15PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On 9/5/07, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 September 2007, Reyk Floeter wrote: > > > I'm the author of the free hardware driver layer for wireless Atheros > > > devices in OpenBSD, also known as "Open

Re: request for information about the "ath5k" licensing

2007-09-05 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On 9/5/07, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 05 September 2007, Reyk Floeter wrote: > > I'm the author of the free hardware driver layer for wireless Atheros > > devices in OpenBSD, also known as "OpenHAL". > > > > I'm still trying to get an idea about the facts and the lates

Re: request for information about the "ath5k" licensing

2007-09-05 Thread Michael Buesch
On Wednesday 05 September 2007, Reyk Floeter wrote: > I'm the author of the free hardware driver layer for wireless Atheros > devices in OpenBSD, also known as "OpenHAL". > > I'm still trying to get an idea about the facts and the latest state > of the incidence that violated the copyright of my c

request for information about the "ath5k" licensing

2007-09-05 Thread Reyk Floeter
Hello! I'm the author of the free hardware driver layer for wireless Atheros devices in OpenBSD, also known as "OpenHAL". I'm still trying to get an idea about the facts and the latest state of the incidence that violated the copyright of my code, because I just returned from vacation. I'm very