On 19/03/2015 20:58, Stefan Bader wrote:
> This was added in 3.10. So the range of kernels affected <3.10 back
> to when nested vmx became somewhat usable. For 3.2 Ben (and
> obviously us) would be affected. Apart from that, I believe, it is
> only 3.4 which has an active longterm. At least that
On 18.03.2015 10:18, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 18/03/2015 09:46, Stefan Bader wrote:
>>
>> Regardless of that, I wonder whether the below (this version untested) sound
>> acceptable for upstream? At least it would make debugging much simpler. :)
>>
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x8
2 matches
Mail list logo
