On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 02:40:20AM -, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hello, Paul,
>
> On April 20, 2025, 12:21 a.m. UTC Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:19:22AM +, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Apr 15, 2025, at 8:19 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> > > > wrote:
> >
Hello, Paul,
On April 20, 2025, 12:21 a.m. UTC Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:19:22AM +, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Apr 15, 2025, at 8:19 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:05:45AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > >> On 4/1
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:19:22AM +, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 15, 2025, at 8:19 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:05:45AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >> On 4/10/2025 2:29 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> +static int rcu_gpwrap_lag_init(void)
>
Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to the
requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its node's
rnp->gpseq.
This results in no testing of ->gpwrap being set. This patch by default
adds 5 minutes of testing with ->gpwrap forced by lowering the delta
> On Apr 15, 2025, at 8:19 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:05:45AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On 4/10/2025 2:29 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
+static int rcu_gpwrap_lag_init(void)
+{
+if (gpwrap_lag_cycle_mins <= 0 || gpwrap_lag_active_mins <= 0
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:05:45AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On 4/10/2025 2:29 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> +static int rcu_gpwrap_lag_init(void)
> >> +{
> >> + if (gpwrap_lag_cycle_mins <= 0 || gpwrap_lag_active_mins <= 0) {
> >> + pr_alert("rcu-torture: lag timing parameters mu
Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to the
requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its node's
rnp->gpseq.
This results in no testing of ->gpwrap being set. This patch by default
adds 5 minutes of testing with ->gpwrap forced by lowering the delta
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:56:24AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On 4/14/2025 10:24 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 08:07:24AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >>> On Apr 11, 2025, at 3:18 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 05:36:32AM -, Joel Fern
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 08:07:24AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 11, 2025, at 3:18 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 05:36:32AM -, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >> Hello, Paul,
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 05:33:16 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> >>> O
On 4/10/2025 2:29 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> +static int rcu_gpwrap_lag_init(void)
>> +{
>> +if (gpwrap_lag_cycle_mins <= 0 || gpwrap_lag_active_mins <= 0) {
>> +pr_alert("rcu-torture: lag timing parameters must be
>> positive\n");
>> +return -EINVAL;
> When rcutort
On 4/14/2025 10:24 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 08:07:24AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 11, 2025, at 3:18 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 05:36:32AM -, Joel Fernandes wrote:
Hello, Paul,
> On Fri, 11 Apr 20
> On Apr 11, 2025, at 3:18 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 05:36:32AM -, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> Hello, Paul,
>>
>>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 05:33:16 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:54:13AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Apr
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 05:36:32AM -, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hello, Paul,
>
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 05:33:16 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:54:13AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:29:03AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Th
Hello, Paul,
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 05:33:16 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:54:13AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:29:03AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:03:27AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: >
> > > Currently
Hello, Paul,
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 05:33:16 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:54:13AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:29:03AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:03:27AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: >
> > > Currently
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:54:13AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:29:03AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:03:27AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: >
> > Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to
> > the > requirement
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:29:03AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:03:27AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: >
> Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to
> the > requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its
> node's > rnp->gpseq
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:03:27AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: >
Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to
the > requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its
node's > rnp->gpseq. > > This results in no testing of ->gpwrap being
set. This patch by def
Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to the
requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its node's
rnp->gpseq.
This results in no testing of ->gpwrap being set. This patch by default
adds 5 minutes of testing with ->gpwrap forced by lowering the delta
Hello, Paul,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:35:35 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
[...]
> > > > kernel/rcu/rcu.h| 4 +++
> > > > kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 64
> > > > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 34 --
> > > > kernel/rcu/tree.h | 1
On 4/10/2025 9:54 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to the
> requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its node's
> rnp->gpseq.
>
> This results in no testing of ->gpwrap being set. This patch by default
> adds 5 min
Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to the
requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its node's
rnp->gpseq.
This results in no testing of ->gpwrap being set. This patch by default
adds 5 minutes of testing with ->gpwrap forced by lowering the delta
Hello, Paul,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:35:35 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
[...]
> > > > kernel/rcu/rcu.h| 4 +++
> > > > kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 64
> > > > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 34 --
> > > > kernel/rcu/tree.h | 1
On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 05:54:00PM +, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Apr 5, 2025, at 1:23 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 12:30:58PM -, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >> Hello, Paul,
> >>
> >>> On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 12:26:12 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> >>> On Sat, M
> On Apr 5, 2025, at 1:23 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 12:30:58PM -, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> Hello, Paul,
>>
>>> On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 12:26:12 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 07:01:42PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
Currently, the -
On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 07:01:42PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to the
> requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its node's
> rnp->gpseq.
>
> This results in no testing of ->gpwrap being set. This patch by def
On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 12:30:58PM -, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hello, Paul,
>
> On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 12:26:12 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 07:01:42PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to the
> > > req
Hello, Paul,
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 12:26:12 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 07:01:42PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to the
> > requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its node's
> > rnp
Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to the
requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its node's
rnp->gpseq.
This results in no testing of ->gpwrap being set. This patch by default
adds 5 minutes of testing with ->gpwrap forced by lowering the delta
29 matches
Mail list logo
