On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 08:59:11AM +0100, Arnaud S . Launay wrote:
> In the fact, the first limit to be reached will be NR_TASKS defined in
> linux/tasks.h:
> #define NR_TASKS512 /* On x86 Max 4092, or 4090 w/APM configured. */
>
> So I wonder if we could really have more than 4092 pr
Le Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 09:01:58PM +0100, Andries Brouwer a écrit:
> > after reaching process count something around 30568, processes start
> > getting pid from start, which ever is the first free entry slot in process
> > table. that means we can't have simultaneously more than roughly 2^15
> > p
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 07:27:58PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> after reaching process count something around 30568, processes start
> getting pid from start, which ever is the first free entry slot in process
> table. that means we can't have simultaneously more than roughly 2^15
> processe
> after reaching process count something around 30568, processes start
> getting pid from start, which ever is the first free entry slot in process
> table. that means we can't have simultaneously more than roughly 2^15
> processes?
Yes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Hi all,
after reaching process count something around 30568, processes start
getting pid from start, which ever is the first free entry slot in process
table. that means we can't have simultaneously more than roughly 2^15
processes?
am i correct?
regards,
Anil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: s
5 matches
Mail list logo
