Re: problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-04 Thread Petko Manolov
TimO wrote: > > My previous replly was targeted more to the comments of R. Polton where > sysreq still functioned but was unable to sync the disk netscape was > reading/writing. The fix for this one was posted by DaveM and is in > the test9.prex kernels. > > As for the hard lockups, I s'pose we

Re: problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-03 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Adam Sampson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 01:54:55PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > It always happens the same although I can't repeat it on demand. > > > Start a kernel compile and go read mail. Somewhere upon > > > switching mail folders in netscape it locks. Box is

Re: problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-03 Thread Adam Sampson
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 01:54:55PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > > It always happens the same although I can't repeat it on demand. > > Start a kernel compile and go read mail. Somewhere upon > > switching mail folders in netscape it locks. Box is _never_ > > under swap when this occurs. Wish

Re: problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-03 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, TimO wrote: > As for the hard lockups, I s'pose we can blame Rik. ;-) I've > been loathe to do so tho' because on my box the locks always > occur with low memory pressure. I actually thought that he had > them fixed with his vmpatch cuz' I didn't get any lockups with a > hea

Re: problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-03 Thread TimO
Petko Manolov wrote: > > > which DaveM submitted a patch some time ago. Check your logs for: > >kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711 > > It might be, but might not. My log files are clear from such error. This > is because of hard locking of the machine. > > I'll test Rik's patch first. > > best

Re: problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-03 Thread Petko Manolov
TimO wrote: > > Rik van Riel wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Petko Manolov wrote: > > > I have the same kind of problems with 2.4.0-test8, test-9-pre[678]. > > > > > > I'd thought it is due to bug in my (usb pegasus) driver which i used >

Re: problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-02 Thread TimO
reboot, and SysRQ cannot do a sync on the partition it is running > > > in either). I have been advised that RvR's memory patches will fix > > > this but I have yet to try. (This behaviour also can be seen with > > > ppp-2.4.0, which is a trifle irritating 8-)

Re: problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-02 Thread Rik van Riel
it is running > > in either). I have been advised that RvR's memory patches will fix > > this but I have yet to try. (This behaviour also can be seen with > > ppp-2.4.0, which is a trifle irritating 8-) > > I have the same kind of problems with 2.4.0-test8, test-9-pre[

Re: problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-02 Thread Petko Manolov
en advised that RvR's memory patches will fix > this but I have yet to try. (This behaviour also can be seen with > ppp-2.4.0, which is a trifle irritating 8-) I have the same kind of problems with 2.4.0-test8, test-9-pre[678]. I'd thought it is due to bug in my (usb pegasus) driver

problems with 2.4.0-test8

2000-10-02 Thread Richard Polton
Hi, I am using 2.4.0-test8 on an i686 laptop. I find that netscape-4.72 keeps locking up. I am not able to kill the process at all (without a reboot, and SysRQ cannot do a sync on the partition it is running in either). I have been advised that RvR's memory patches will fix this but I have