On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 02:25:55PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>"George Georgalis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I'm very defiantly seeing a problem with the 2.6.11
>> kernel and my spamassassin setup. However, it's not
>> clear exactly where the problem is, seems like sa
>> but it might be 2.6.
"George Georgalis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm very defiantly seeing a problem with the 2.6.11
> kernel and my spamassassin setup. However, it's not
> clear exactly where the problem is, seems like sa
> but it might be 2.6.11 with daemontools + qmail +
> QMAIL_QUEUE.
>
> A sure sign of it i
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 05:37:59PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
>"George Georgalis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:28:35PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
>>> To simplify, what about these two:
>>> mplayer foo.mpg
>>> mplayer foo.mpg < mediafiles.txt
>>
>> The particular host does not
"George Georgalis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:28:35PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
>> To simplify, what about these two:
>> mplayer foo.mpg
>> mplayer foo.mpg < mediafiles.txt
>
> The particular host does not have X support so mpg is out.
Well, use any one of the files list
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:28:35PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
>"George Georgalis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It (Gerrit Pape's technique) very defiantly stopped working a few revs
>> back (2.6.7?). I'm seeing a similar failed read from /dev/rtc and
>> mplayer with 2.6.10, now too.
>
>The /proc/kmsg
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005, Paul Jarc uttered the following:
> "George Georgalis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It (Gerrit Pape's technique) very defiantly stopped working a few revs
>> back (2.6.7?). I'm seeing a similar failed read from /dev/rtc and
>> mplayer with 2.6.10, now too.
>
> The /proc/kmsg p
"George Georgalis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It (Gerrit Pape's technique) very defiantly stopped working a few revs
> back (2.6.7?). I'm seeing a similar failed read from /dev/rtc and
> mplayer with 2.6.10, now too.
The /proc/kmsg problem happens because the kernel now checks for
permission at
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:06:11PM +, Nix wrote:
>> An interesting technique that allows a program (such as a log writer)
>> to run as an unprivileged user, while receiving privileged data. (taken
>> almost verbatim from Gerrit Pape's socklog)
>>
>> #!/bin/sh
>> exec > exec 2>&1
>> exec softl
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, George Georgalis announced authoritatively:
> Here's what I'm doing that is broken. I use tcpserver (functionally
> similar to inetd) to receive an incoming smtp connection. While the
> smtp session is still open, the message is piped to a temp file which
> is then scanned for s
George Georgalis wrote:
Here is a problem with 2.6.10:
while read file; do mplayer $file ; done
or
tail -n93 mediafiles.txt | while read file; do mplayer $file ; done
for each file path in that text file I get:
Failed to open /dev/rtc: Permission denied (it should be readable by the user.)
^- Thi
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:19:53 -0500, George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:58:14AM -0500, George Georgalis wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:37:03PM +, Nix wrote:
> >>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, George Georgalis uttered the following:
> >>> I recall a problem a while
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:58:14AM -0500, George Georgalis wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:37:03PM +, Nix wrote:
>>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, George Georgalis uttered the following:
>>> I recall a problem a while back with a pipe from
>>> /proc/kmsg that was sent by root to a program with a
>>> use
falseys
rm "$tmp"
exit 31
;;
*) # spamc error,
echo "$0 error, spamc exit $sce"
exit 71
esac
exit 81 # Internal bug
>If you can reproduce it consistently, *please* report
>this to the linux-kernel list!
I did, but have had no response to my
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:53:50 -0500, George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:37:06 -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:57:28PM -0500, George Georgalis wrote:
> > > I recall a problem a while back with a pipe from
> > > /proc/kmsg th
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:37:06 -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:57:28PM -0500, George Georgalis wrote:
> > I recall a problem a while back with a pipe from
> > /proc/kmsg that was sent by root to a program with a
> > user uid. The fix was to run the logging pr
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:57:28PM -0500, George Georgalis wrote:
> I recall a problem a while back with a pipe from
> /proc/kmsg that was sent by root to a program with a
> user uid. The fix was to run the logging program as
> root. Has that protected pipe method been extended
> since 2.6.8.1?
>
I recall a problem a while back with a pipe from
/proc/kmsg that was sent by root to a program with a
user uid. The fix was to run the logging program as
root. Has that protected pipe method been extended
since 2.6.8.1?
I'm very defiantly seeing a problem with the 2.6.11
kernel and my spamassassin
Please keep me in cc as I'm not presently subscribed to lkml)
I recall a problem a while back with a pipe from
/proc/kmsg that was sent by root to a program with a
user uid. The fix was to run the logging program as
root. Has that protected pipe method been extended
since 2.6.8.1?
I'm very defia
18 matches
Mail list logo
