Jan 2001 07:34:05 +0100
> Subject: Re: pppoe in 2.4.0
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ian Macdonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 7:10 AM
> Subject: Re: pppoe in 2.4.0
>
>
> >
Thank you all. I was silly and didn't create the /dev/ppp device.
On 19 Jan 2001 07:10:30 +0100, Ian Macdonald wrote:
> On 19 Jan 2001 03:51:20 +0100 in caliban.linux.kernel, you wrote:
>
> >Does anyone have pppoe working with 2.4.0?
> >
> >I'm running 2.4.0-ac9 with ppp and pppoe compiled int
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Macdonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: pppoe in 2.4.0
> On 19 Jan 2001 03:51:20 +0100 in caliban.linux.kernel, you wrote:
>
> >Does anyone have pp
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Macdonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: pppoe in 2.4.0
> On 19 Jan 2001 03:51:20 +0100 in caliban.linux.kernel, you wrote:
>
> >Does anyone have pp
On 19 Jan 2001 03:51:20 +0100 in caliban.linux.kernel, you wrote:
>Does anyone have pppoe working with 2.4.0?
>
>I'm running 2.4.0-ac9 with ppp and pppoe compiled into the kernel (I've
>tried with modules too)
>
>The pppd simply refuses to acknowlege the presence of ppp support in the
>kernel.
>T
Hello,
Does anyone have pppoe working with 2.4.0?
I'm running 2.4.0-ac9 with ppp and pppoe compiled into the kernel (I've
tried with modules too)
The pppd simply refuses to acknowlege the presence of ppp support in the
kernel.
The last release of pppd was in august 2000. Was this before the p
6 matches
Mail list logo