Re: ppp in 2.6.11-rc2 Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c

2005-01-23 Thread Rogério Brito
On Jan 23 2005, Johnny Strom wrote: > I have the same problem with 2.6.11-rc2 I am using ppp with rp-pppoe-3.5 > it starts like this as soon as it brings upp the link. I am also seeing this "Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140" message spamming my logs. It is quite scary, might I a

Re: ppp in 2.6.11-rc2 Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c

2005-01-23 Thread Johnny Strom
Hi I have the same problem with 2.6.11-rc2 I am using ppp with rp-pppoe-3.5 it starts like this as soon as it brings upp the link. This is from the booutup of my system: Jan 21 19:45:14 mail kernel: [] ip_send_reply+0x1e8/0x250 Jan 21 19:45:14 mail kernel: [] ip_reply_glue_bits+0x0/0x90 Jan 21

Re: ppp in 2.6.11-rc2 Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c

2005-01-22 Thread boris mogwitz
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 11:04:57AM -0500, Pete Clements wrote: > FYI: > Get the following with 2.6.11-rc2 and ppp (pppoe), continuous. > Non-ppp boxes fine. Last prior kernel 2.6.11-rc1-bk5 is good > (have not tried bk6 - bk9). > > Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140 > [local_bh

ppp in 2.6.11-rc2 Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c

2005-01-22 Thread Pete Clements
FYI: Get the following with 2.6.11-rc2 and ppp (pppoe), continuous. Non-ppp boxes fine. Last prior kernel 2.6.11-rc1-bk5 is good (have not tried bk6 - bk9). Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140 [local_bh_enable+44/104] local_bh_enable+0x2c/0x68 [ppp_async_push+358/372] ppp_asy