On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am not seeing those patches in tip.git tree as of today.
>> What is still wrong with those patches? I think they
>> are good for providing the basic enablement for HSW.
>
> There were still problems
* Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not seeing those patches in tip.git tree as of today.
> What is still wrong with those patches? I think they
> are good for providing the basic enablement for HSW.
There were still problems with them so they didn't make it
into v3.9 - now that the devel
Hi,
I am not seeing those patches in tip.git tree as of today.
What is still wrong with those patches? I think they
are good for providing the basic enablement for HSW.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
> ported to t
This is based on v7 of the full Haswell PMU support, but
ported to the latest perf/core and stripped down to the
bare bones
Only for very extremly basic usage.
Most interesting new features are not in this patchkit
(full version is
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc.git
[Updated version for the latest master tree and various fixes,
addressing review feedback. See end for details.
This should be ready for merging now, just waiting for Peter&Ingo.]
This adds perf PMU support for the upcoming Haswell core. The patchkit
is fairly large, mainly due to various enhan
5 matches
Mail list logo