Re: now that NFS V3 is in 2.2.18pre, could we *please* add the ide-patch

2000-10-17 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > >If they will be accepted, I will update them and maintain them. > >I just do not have the time to run two/three trees and prepare the stuff > >for 2.5 > > > >> Because it is unmaintained? O

Re: now that NFS V3 is in 2.2.18pre, could we *please* add the ide-patch

2000-10-15 Thread Chris Kloiber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I know it crashes some via chipsets when autotuning (IIRC), but > if it were added behind CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL it couldn't do any > harm, could it? > > I stuck between HPT370 support in 2.4.x but non-working isdn lzs > compression code and the reverse in 2.2.x. Just n

now that NFS V3 is in 2.2.18pre, could we *please* add the ide-patch

2000-10-15 Thread thunder7
I know it crashes some via chipsets when autotuning (IIRC), but if it were added behind CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL it couldn't do any harm, could it? I stuck between HPT370 support in 2.4.x but non-working isdn lzs compression code and the reverse in 2.2.x. Just now I adapted Andre's 2.2.18-3 patch to