[quoted lines by Philipp Matthias Hahn on May 24, 2001, at 09:31]
>Do you realy mean what you wrote in the Subject line:
>
>Subject : Re: *nfs* mount by label not working.
No, I mean ext2. It would appear that my mount command was a little old. A
newer version of mount works.
--
Da
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Dave Mielke wrote:
> Using kernel 2.2.17-14 as supplied by RedHat, and using mount from
> mount-2.9u-4, mounting by label using the -L option does not work.
>
> mount -L backup1 /a
Do you realy mean what you wrote in the Subject line:
Subject : Re: *nfs* mo
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 05:34:22PM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote:
> I presume that you're assuming that my /proc/partitions is empty because its
> size shows as 0:
>
> ls -l /proc/partitions
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root0 May 23 17:31 /proc/partitions
Ah, yes, sorry - I was too q
[quoted lines by Guest section DW on May 23, 2001, at 23:12]
>(i) Your version is ancient, but it might be good enough.
mount -V
mount: mount-2.9u
>(ii) Labels as used in "mount -L label" are ext2 labels only
>(well, xfs also works if I recall correctly)
I set the labels with e2label.
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:11:41PM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote:
> Using kernel 2.2.17-14 as supplied by RedHat, and using mount from
> mount-2.9u-4, mounting by label using the -L option does not work.
>
> mount -L backup1 /a
> mount: no such partition found
>
> The mount man page says that
v2.10r works.
[tim@abit tim]# mount -V
mount: mount-2.10r
[tim@abit tim]# tune2fs -L spare /dev/hda10
tune2fs 1.19, 13-Jul-2000 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
[tim@abit tim]# mount -L spare /mnt
[tim@abit tim]# df /mnt
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda10
Using kernel 2.2.17-14 as supplied by RedHat, and using mount from
mount-2.9u-4, mounting by label using the -L option does not work.
mount -L backup1 /a
mount: no such partition found
The mount man page says that "/proc/partitions" must exist.
ls -l /proc/partitions
-r--r--r--
7 matches
Mail list logo
