David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Wagner Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:16:59 +0100
>
>> Hmm, that would warrant nuking all the reference counts on every
>> driver.
>
> That's not true. When packets are in flight, references go
> to the device and the device
From: Wagner Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:16:59 +0100
> Hmm, that would warrant nuking all the reference counts on every
> driver.
That's not true. When packets are in flight, references go
to the device and the device cannot be unloaded until those
references get dropped
Wagner Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> So why can I remove a driver serving live network traffic?
Why not ? It is quite common to remove physically a network/storage
device.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMA
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:45:11 +0100
> Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Under 2.6.23.1, my lsmod output shows this:
>>
>> $ lsmod | grep tg3
>> tg3 100580 0
>>
>> The usage count is zero, even though it drives my two
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:45:11 +0100
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Under 2.6.23.1, my lsmod output shows this:
>
> $ lsmod | grep tg3
> tg3 100580 0
>
> The usage count is zero, even though it drives my two physical
> interfaces:
>
> $ ls -l /sys/class/ne
Hi!
Under 2.6.23.1, my lsmod output shows this:
$ lsmod | grep tg3
tg3 100580 0
The usage count is zero, even though it drives my two physical
interfaces:
$ ls -l /sys/class/net/eth-gb?/device/driver
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2007-11-21 19:58 /sys/class/net/eth-gb1/device/dri
6 matches
Mail list logo