nt, and then it
checks "netif_xmit_stopped" and finds that the queue is already stopped.
In this case, it will complain that:
"Virtual device ... asks to queue packet!"
To prevent "__dev_queue_xmit" from generating this complaint, we should
not call "netif_stop_queu
nt, and then it
checks "netif_xmit_stopped" and finds that the queue is already stopped.
In this case, it will complain that:
"Virtual device ... asks to queue packet!"
To prevent "__dev_queue_xmit" from generating this complaint, we should
not call "netif_stop_queu
nt, and then it
checks "netif_xmit_stopped" and finds that the queue is already stopped.
In this case, it will complain that:
"Virtual device ... asks to queue packet!"
To prevent "__dev_queue_xmit" from generating this complaint, we should
not call "netif_stop_queu
nt, and then it
checks "netif_xmit_stopped" and finds that the queue is already stopped.
In this case, it will complain that:
"Virtual device ... asks to queue packet!"
To prevent "__dev_queue_xmit" from generating this complaint, we should
not call "netif_stop_queu
nt, and then it
checks "netif_xmit_stopped" and finds that the queue is already stopped.
In this case, it will complain that:
"Virtual device ... asks to queue packet!"
To prevent "__dev_queue_xmit" from generating this complaint, we should
not call "netif_stop_queu
nt, and then it
checks "netif_xmit_stopped" and finds that the queue is already stopped.
In this case, it will complain that:
"Virtual device ... asks to queue packet!"
To prevent "__dev_queue_xmit" from generating this complaint, we should
not call "netif_stop_queu
nt, and then it
checks "netif_xmit_stopped" and finds that the queue is already stopped.
In this case, it will complain that:
"Virtual device ... asks to queue packet!"
To prevent "__dev_queue_xmit" from generating this complaint, we should
not call "netif_stop_queu
; may still have already
> been called. This is because in "__dev_close_many", "ops->ndo_stop" is
> called before clearing the "IFF_UP" flag.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] net: lapbether: Remove netif_start_queue / netif_stop_queue
at the queue is already
stopped.
In this case, it will complain that:
"Virtual device ... asks to queue packet!"
To prevent "__dev_queue_xmit" from generating this complaint, we should
not call "netif_stop_queue" in "ops->ndo_stop".
We also don
case, it will complain that:
"Virtual device ... asks to queue packet!"
To prevent "__dev_queue_xmit" from generating this complaint, we should
not call "netif_stop_queue" in "ops->ndo_stop".
We also don't need to call "netif_start_queue&
sebastien person wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I'm trying to port a ethernet device from 2.2 to 2.4. whith the new way of
> dealing with dev->tbusy and dev->start (e.g. by using netif_startqueue for
> example) I've understand that the netif_start_queue call put a flag
hi,
I'm trying to port a ethernet device from 2.2 to 2.4. whith the new way of
dealing with dev->tbusy and dev->start (e.g. by using netif_startqueue for
example) I've understand that the netif_start_queue call put a flag that
telling
the device isn't busy but I can't
12 matches
Mail list logo
