Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > yes, but is it a dual machine or is it an N-way SMP with N > 2? the
> > other guy with iptables/SMP problems also has a quad box. could this
> > perhaps be a problem only when you have more than two proces
Rusty,
Excellent! I applied the patch and netfilter is happy with 4 processors. Thank you
and
thanks to everyone else who sent suggestions.
Roger
Rusty Russell wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > yes, but is it a dual machine or is it an N-way SMP with N > 2? the
> >
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> yes, but is it a dual machine or is it an N-way SMP with N > 2? the
> other guy with iptables/SMP problems also has a quad box. could this
> perhaps be a problem only when you have more than two processors?
Yes, hacked my machine to think it had 4 cpu
Rusty,
I have two identical machines and the problem exists on both. The machines
have Megaplex II quad Pentium III Xeon PCI ISA system boards. I have 550
Pentium III Xeon, 100/512 processors. I am running test11 which I
downloaded a few days ago. I have installed no patches. My iptables is
Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >
> > I have 2.4.0 test 10 and test 11 installed on a multiprocessor (Intel)
> > machine. I have tried both test versions of the kernel. I configured
> > the kernel for single
> > and multi processor. Whe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
> I have 2.4.0 test 10 and test 11 installed on a multiprocessor (Intel)
> machine. I have tried both test versions of the kernel. I configured
> the kernel for single
> and multi processor. When I boot single processor, iptables will run
> fine. W
Roger Crandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I should have mentioned this is a 4 processor machine with a 64 bit
> buss.
perhaps the netfilter stuff isn't 4-way SMP safe. my quad ppro box
seizes with iptables too. however, many people report it working with
2-way SMP boxen.
has anyone gotten
Roger Crandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have 2.4.0 test 10 and test 11 installed on a multiprocessor (Intel)
> machine. I have tried both test versions of the kernel. I configured
> the kernel for single
> and multi processor. When I boot single processor, iptables will run
> fine. Wh
On Fri, 01 Dec 2000 09:41:58 -0700,
Roger Crandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Killing interrupt handler
>scheduling in interrupt
>
>The kernel logs nothing and you must reset the machine to bring it back
linux/Documentation/oops-tracing.txt
linux/Documentation/serial-console.txt
-
To unsubscri
[Roger Crandell]
> When I boot the machine with the multiprocessor kernel and run
> iptables, the kernel dumps several pages of hex and the final two
> lines of output are:
>
> Killing interrupt handler
> scheduling in interrupt
Look through the "several pages of hex" for any number in square +
I should have mentioned this is a 4 processor machine with a 64 bit
buss.
Roger Crandell
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
I have 2.4.0 test 10 and test 11 installed on a multiprocessor (Intel)
machine. I have tried both test versions of the kernel. I configured
the kernel for single
and multi processor. When I boot single processor, iptables will run
fine. When I boot the machine with the multiprocessor kernel
12 matches
Mail list logo
