Re: [mit-devel] Re: module-init-tools-3.3-pre10 available

2007-03-22 Thread Jon Masters
Jon Masters wrote: Sergey Vlasov wrote: Has a final decision about generated files been made? I don't see any updates in the git repo, and man pages are still broken I'm doing some patching this afternoon anyway, and it's on my todo. I pushed up v3.3-pre11 just now. If all goes to plan, t

Re: [mit-devel] Re: module-init-tools-3.3-pre10 available

2007-03-20 Thread Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
Em Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:03:45 +0300 Sergey Vlasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: | On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 11:13:45AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote: | > Jan Engelhardt wrote: | > | > >Out of the box perhaps if it is the .tar.bz2 archive, but the same does not | > >always hold for CVS repos, much less SV

Re: [mit-devel] Re: module-init-tools-3.3-pre10 available

2007-03-20 Thread Jon Masters
Sergey Vlasov wrote: Has a final decision about generated files been made? I don't see any updates in the git repo, and man pages are still broken I'm doing some patching this afternoon anyway, and it's on my todo. Jon. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel

Re: [mit-devel] Re: module-init-tools-3.3-pre10 available

2007-03-20 Thread Sergey Vlasov
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 11:13:45AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > >Out of the box perhaps if it is the .tar.bz2 archive, but the same does not > >always hold for CVS repos, much less SVNs [random guess on svn]. He who > >pulls > >from a developer tree mostly knows to run 'a

Re: module-init-tools-3.3-pre10 available

2007-02-24 Thread Jon Masters
Jan Engelhardt wrote: Out of the box perhaps if it is the .tar.bz2 archive, but the same does not always hold for CVS repos, much less SVNs [random guess on svn]. He who pulls from a developer tree mostly knows to run 'autogen.sh' or 'autoreconf -fi' beforehand. You know what, you're right of

Re: module-init-tools-3.3-pre10 available

2007-02-24 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Feb 23 2007 10:41, Jon Masters wrote: > > I think it's like the configure/Makefile.in situation. These files should > technically not be in the repo either (and you removed them in your tree) but > I > re-added them because people have an expectation that: > > ./configure > make > > will do so

Re: module-init-tools-3.3-pre10 available

2007-02-23 Thread Jon Masters
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote: On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:52:20 -0500 Jon Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Sergey Vlasov wrote: | | > I see that you have merged some patches which change depmod.8. | > However, this file is generated from doc/depmod.sgml, which was not | > changed appropria

Re: module-init-tools-3.3-pre10 available

2007-02-23 Thread Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:52:20 -0500 Jon Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Sergey Vlasov wrote: | | > I see that you have merged some patches which change depmod.8. | > However, this file is generated from doc/depmod.sgml, which was not | > changed appropriately. | | Ah. A valid point - Luiz, d

Re: module-init-tools-3.3-pre10 available

2007-02-22 Thread Jon Masters
Sergey Vlasov wrote: I see that you have merged some patches which change depmod.8. However, this file is generated from doc/depmod.sgml, which was not changed appropriately. Ah. A valid point - Luiz, do you want to redo your patch or I can take a look at the SGML source myself. Jon. - To u

module-init-tools-3.3-pre10 available

2007-02-21 Thread Jon Masters
Yo, After some delay[0] I have uploaded a new version of module-init-tools to http://www.kerneltools.org/ This release mostly has a bunch of build fixes, some memory leakage cleanups that will benefit systems that actually run out of memory (embedded, etc.) and various other things in the ch