Re: mktime in include/linux

2001-06-22 Thread Rick Hohensee
> > At 1:43 PM +0200 2001-06-22, Erik Mouw wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 10:30:40PM -0400, Rick Hohensee wrote: > >> Why does Linux have a mktime routine fully coded in linux/time.h that > >> conflicts directly with the ANSI C standard library routine of the same > >> name? It breaks a cou

Re: mktime in include/linux

2001-06-22 Thread Jonathan Lundell
At 1:43 PM +0200 2001-06-22, Erik Mouw wrote: >On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 10:30:40PM -0400, Rick Hohensee wrote: >> Why does Linux have a mktime routine fully coded in linux/time.h that >> conflicts directly with the ANSI C standard library routine of the same >> name? It breaks a couple things ag

Re: mktime in include/linux

2001-06-22 Thread Erik Mouw
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 10:30:40PM -0400, Rick Hohensee wrote: > Why does Linux have a mktime routine fully coded in linux/time.h that > conflicts directly with the ANSI C standard library routine of the same > name? It breaks a couple things against libc5, including gcc 3.0. OK, you > don't care

mktime in include/linux

2001-06-21 Thread Rick Hohensee
Why does Linux have a mktime routine fully coded in linux/time.h that conflicts directly with the ANSI C standard library routine of the same name? It breaks a couple things against libc5, including gcc 3.0. OK, you don't care about libc5. It's still pretty weird. Wierd? Weird. Rick Hohensee www.