Ok, I just revisited the "Sarah Sharp" "no more abuse" blogpost, where I
wrote a long comment on the problem she was describing, only to find
that my comment was not there. I felt a certain degree of provocation,
since this was a serious and honest post, without any kind of abuse,
from someone
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 09:07 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > Perhaps what might help here is a kernel organizational chart.
[]
> the complete chart will in no doubt break 80
> characters limit. Actually as the hierarchy is quite flat, I can't
> image how long the longest line will be.
I think it really
> Perhaps what might help here is a kernel organizational chart. A graph
> of who sends pull requests to Linus, and their subsystem maintainers.
> For example, in the USB "branch" there would be:
>
> Linus Torvalds
> (Linux kernel release engine
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> [...]
>
> ... and now you want to 'shut down' the discussion. With all due
> respect, you started it, you have put out various heavy accusations here
> and elsewhere, so you might as well take responsibility for it and let
> the discussion be brought to a conclusion, w
* Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Sarah Sharp wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:39:07PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Sarah Sharp
> >
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:01:27PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
>
> I'm not trying to shut down this discussion. But please, let's continue
> this discussion at KS, away from the court of public opinion. I would
> love for this email to serve as a final summary of my opinion. We can
> use this ema
Am Freitag, 19. Juli 2013, 12:01:27 schrieb Sarah Sharp:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Sarah Sharp wrote:
[…]
> "Respect" means different things to different people. Here's a list of
> potentially disrespectful behaviors:
>
> * cussing
> * belittling stat
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 12:01 -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Move on, agree to disagree, and let's discuss this at KS.
+1
(Sorry for the reply ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Sarah Sharp wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:39:07PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Sarah Sharp
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh, FFS,
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> ... and now you want to 'shut down' the discussion. With all due respect,
> you started it, you have put out various heavy accusations here and
> elsewhere, so you might as well take responsibility for it and let the
> discussion
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> [...]
>
> Mistakes in patches and code happen all the time. Linus rarely if ever
> flamed me for _that_ - sh*t happens.
>
> What he flames me for, and what you (with all due respect) still don't
> seem to understand, are _META_ mistakes. Top level maintainer level
> m
* Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:39:07PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Sarah Sharp
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Oh, FFS, I just called out on private email for "playing the victim
> > > > card". I will r
12 matches
Mail list logo
