Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > > * get_pid causes a deadlock when all pid numbers are in use.
> > > In the worst case, only 10900 threads are required to exhaust
> > > the 15 bit pid space.
> >
> > Yes. I posted a patch for 31-bit pids once or twice.
> > There is no great hurry, but on the ot
Hi!
> > * get_pid causes a deadlock when all pid numbers are in use.
> > In the worst case, only 10900 threads are required to exhaust
> > the 15 bit pid space.
>
> Yes. I posted a patch for 31-bit pids once or twice.
> There is no great hurry, but on the other hand, it is always
> better to mak
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 05:33:55PM +0100, Manfred wrote:
> * get_pid causes a deadlock when all pid numbers are in use.
> In the worst case, only 10900 threads are required to exhaust
> the 15 bit pid space.
Yes. I posted a patch for 31-bit pids once or twice.
There is no great hurry, but on the
I found 4 minor problems in the thread creation code:
* 2.2 reserved 4 threads for root, and 2.4 still has the
define (MIN_THREADS_LEFT_FOR_ROOT), but the code is missing :-(
* get_pid causes a deadlock when all pid numbers are in use.
In the worst case, only 10900 threads are required to exhaus
4 matches
Mail list logo