Re: mdadm raid1 regression

2014-01-22 Thread Vasiliy Tolstov
2014/1/6 NeilBrown : > The value given to --data-offset is assumed to be kilobytes unless it has a > suffix: 'M' for megabytes, 's' for sectors. > > The value reported by 'mdadm -D' is (as it says) in sectors. > 1024 kilobytes is 2048 sectors. > If you want to specify sectors, add an 's' suffix.

Re: mdadm raid1 regression

2014-01-05 Thread NeilBrown
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 10:48:03 +0400 Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > 2013/4/22 NeilBrown : > > I'll try to make sure that works correctly for the next release. > > Thanks for the report. > > > Sorry, Neil. for bumping up old thread. I'm again have problems with > data-offset param for mdadm. > I'm using

Re: mdadm raid1 regression

2013-12-26 Thread Vasiliy Tolstov
2013/4/22 NeilBrown : > I'll try to make sure that works correctly for the next release. > Thanks for the report. Sorry, Neil. for bumping up old thread. I'm again have problems with data-offset param for mdadm. I'm using version from git master (guthub). If i try to create raid1 like /sbin/mdadm

Re: mdadm raid1 regression

2013-04-21 Thread Vasiliy Tolstov
2013/4/22 NeilBrown : >> Hello. I'm using linux 3.8.6 and mdadm 3.2.6 (from git). >> I have many raid1 arrays that have data offset 2048 (metadata 1.2, >> created with various mdadm versions but mostly 3.2.1 on linux 2.6.32). >> If i create raid1 with never mdadm on 3.8.6 i have data offset 8192??

Re: mdadm raid1 regression

2013-04-21 Thread NeilBrown
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:38:53 +0400 Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > Hello. I'm using linux 3.8.6 and mdadm 3.2.6 (from git). > I have many raid1 arrays that have data offset 2048 (metadata 1.2, > created with various mdadm versions but mostly 3.2.1 on linux 2.6.32). > If i create raid1 with never mdadm o

Re: mdadm raid1 regression

2013-04-19 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:38:53PM +0400, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > Hello. I'm using linux 3.8.6 and mdadm 3.2.6 (from git). > I have many raid1 arrays that have data offset 2048 (metadata 1.2, > created with various mdadm versions but mostly 3.2.1 on linux 2.6.32). > If i create raid1 with never md

mdadm raid1 regression

2013-04-18 Thread Vasiliy Tolstov
Hello. I'm using linux 3.8.6 and mdadm 3.2.6 (from git). I have many raid1 arrays that have data offset 2048 (metadata 1.2, created with various mdadm versions but mostly 3.2.1 on linux 2.6.32). If i create raid1 with never mdadm on 3.8.6 i have data offset 8192?? Why? My problem: Sometimes i'm do