Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> At 18:59 26/06/2001, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 10:20:51 2001
> > >
> > > This patch fixes the problem. Please consider applying.
> > >
> > > --- linux-2.4.6-pre5/drivers/block/loop.cSat Jun 23 0
At 18:59 26/06/2001, Jari Ruusu wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 10:20:51 2001
> >
> > This patch fixes the problem. Please consider applying.
> >
> > --- linux-2.4.6-pre5/drivers/block/loop.cSat Jun 23 07:52:39 2001
> > +++ linux/drivers/b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 10:20:51 2001
>
> This patch fixes the problem. Please consider applying.
>
> --- linux-2.4.6-pre5/drivers/block/loop.cSat Jun 23 07:52:39 2001
> +++ linux/drivers/block/loop.cTue Jun 26 09:21:47 2001
> @@ -
Rogier Wolff writes:
>> But why 1024?
>> (Or make the set blocksize ioctl also work on loop devices.)
> I thought the change was a "quick hack" that would make stuff work
> (page cache?) near the end of the file. That would mean that this kind
> of "quick hack" won't work.
I am not sure I can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 10:20:51 2001
>
> This patch fixes the problem. Please consider applying.
>
> --- linux-2.4.6-pre5/drivers/block/loop.cSat Jun 23 07:52:39 2001
> +++ linux/drivers/block/loop.cTue Jun 26 09:21:47 2001
> @@ -
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 10:20:51 2001
This patch fixes the problem. Please consider applying.
--- linux-2.4.6-pre5/drivers/block/loop.cSat Jun 23 07:52:39 2001
+++ linux/drivers/block/loop.cTue Jun 26 09:21:47 2001
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@
bs = 0;
This patch fixes the problem. Please consider applying.
--- linux-2.4.6-pre5/drivers/block/loop.c Sat Jun 23 07:52:39 2001
+++ linux/drivers/block/loop.c Tue Jun 26 09:21:47 2001
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@
bs = 0;
if (blksize_size[MAJOR(lo_device)])
bs = blksize_si
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Jari Ruusu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> File backed loop device on 4k block size ext2 filesystem:
>
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=file1 bs=1024 count=10
> 10+0 records in
> 10+0 records out
> # losetup /dev/loop0 file1
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Jari Ruusu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> File backed loop device on 4k block size ext2 filesystem:
>
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=file1 bs=1024 count=10
> 10+0 records in
> 10+0 records out
> # losetup /dev/loop0 file1
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/
From: Jari Ruusu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File backed loop device on 4k block size ext2 filesystem:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=file1 bs=1024 count=10
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
# losetup /dev/loop0 file1
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/loop0 bs=1024 count=10 conv=notrunc
dd:
File backed loop device on 4k block size ext2 filesystem:
debian:/root # dd if=/dev/zero of=file1 bs=1024 count=10
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
debian:/root # losetup /dev/loop0 file1
debian:/root # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/loop0 bs=1024 count=10 conv=notrunc
dd: /dev/loop0: No space left on d
11 matches
Mail list logo