Re: lockdep warning in btrfs in 4.8-rc3

2016-09-09 Thread Chris Mason
On 09/08/2016 08:50 PM, Dave Jones wrote: On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 08:58:48AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > On 09/08/2016 07:50 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 09/08/2016 01:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >> Chris, > >> > >> with 4.8-rc3 I get the following on an s390 box: > >

Re: lockdep warning in btrfs in 4.8-rc3

2016-09-08 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 08:58:48AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > On 09/08/2016 07:50 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 09/08/2016 01:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >> Chris, > >> > >> with 4.8-rc3 I get the following on an s390 box: > > > > Sorry for the noise, just saw the fix in

Re: lockdep warning in btrfs in 4.8-rc3

2016-09-08 Thread Chris Mason
On 09/08/2016 07:50 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: On 09/08/2016 01:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: Chris, with 4.8-rc3 I get the following on an s390 box: Sorry for the noise, just saw the fix in your pull request. The lockdep splat is still there, we'll need to annotate this one a

Re: lockdep warning in btrfs in 4.8-rc3

2016-09-08 Thread Christian Borntraeger
On 09/08/2016 01:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Chris, > > with 4.8-rc3 I get the following on an s390 box: Sorry for the noise, just saw the fix in your pull request.

lockdep warning in btrfs in 4.8-rc3

2016-09-08 Thread Christian Borntraeger
Chris, with 4.8-rc3 I get the following on an s390 box: [ 1094.009172] = [ 1094.009174] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 1094.009177] 4.8.0-rc3 #126 Tainted: GW [ 1094.009179] - [