Re: linux-next: missing merge fix for the access_once tree

2014-12-28 Thread Christian Borntraeger
Am 23.12.2014 um 07:34 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: > Hi Linus, > > On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 20:12:22 -0800 Linus Torvalds > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> >>> I have been carrying this merge fix patch for some time. It should >>> have gone into the merge

Re: linux-next: missing merge fix for the access_once tree

2014-12-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Linus, On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 20:12:22 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > I have been carrying this merge fix patch for some time. It should > > have gone into the merge of the access_once tree. > > No, you had a different tree

Re: linux-next: missing merge fix for the access_once tree

2014-12-22 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > I have been carrying this merge fix patch for some time. It should > have gone into the merge of the access_once tree. No, you had a different tree that got merged into linux-next, that made it an error to do ACCESS_ONCE() on a structu

linux-next: missing merge fix for the access_once tree

2014-12-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Linus, I have been carrying this merge fix patch for some time. It should have gone into the merge of the access_once tree. From: Christian Borntraeger Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 22:01:59 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] x86/xen/p2m: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on