2015-05-20 18:47 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven :
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Alexandre Belloni
> wrote:
>> On 20/05/2015 at 09:35:36 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
>>> 2015-05-20 9:27 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell :
>>> > Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in
>>> >
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
> On 20/05/2015 at 09:35:36 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
>> 2015-05-20 9:27 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell :
>> > Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in
>> > arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig between various com
On 20/05/2015 at 09:35:36 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
> 2015-05-20 9:27 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell :
> > Hi Kukjin,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig between various commits from the
> > arm-soc and at91 trees and v
Le 20/05/2015 02:27, Stephen Rothwell a écrit :
> Hi Kukjin,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig between various commits from the
> arm-soc and at91 trees and various commits from the samsung tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below)
2015-05-20 9:27 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell :
> Hi Kukjin,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig between various commits from the
> arm-soc and at91 trees and various commits from the samsung tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and c
Hi Kukjin,
Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig between various commits from the
arm-soc and at91 trees and various commits from the samsung tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
-
6 matches
Mail list logo