Thanks Stephen,
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:
>
> virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 36e5cfd410ad ("KVM: arm/arm64: Properly handle arch-timer IRQs after
> vtimer_save_state
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:
virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
between commit:
36e5cfd410ad ("KVM: arm/arm64: Properly handle arch-timer IRQs after
vtimer_save_state")
from Linus' tree and commit:
70450a9fbe06 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Don't cache the timer I
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
between commit:
fd6c8c206fc5 ("arm/arm64: KVM: set right LR register value for 32 bit guest
when inject abort")
from Linus' tree and commit:
00586cdaf597 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Unify 32bit
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm/kvm/emulate.c
between commit:
fd6c8c206fc5 ("arm/arm64: KVM: set right LR register value for 32 bit guest
when inject abort")
from Linus' tree and commit:
00586cdaf597 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Unify 32bit fault i
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 02:02:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got conflicts in:
>
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 5b0d2cc28058 ("KVM: arm64: Ensure LRs are clear wh
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got conflicts in:
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
between commit:
5b0d2cc28058 ("KVM: arm64: Ensure LRs are clear when they should be")
from Linus' tree and commits:
328e56647944 ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Defer to
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 16/04/2015 21:10, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >> >
> > As it turns out, it was not the same logic as Stephen's resolution.
> > Stephen's resolution is bussy, because vlr is passed by value to
> > vgic_queue_irq_to_lr() and the
On 16/04/2015 21:10, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> >
> As it turns out, it was not the same logic as Stephen's resolution.
> Stephen's resolution is bussy, because vlr is passed by value to
> vgic_queue_irq_to_lr() and therefore the call to sync the elrsr does not
> have any effect.
>
> Unfortunat
Hi Paolo and Marc,
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 06:20:15PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 18/03/2015 08:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:41:11PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:15:13AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 17:20:15 +0100
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> Hi Paolo,
>
> > On 18/03/2015 08:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > Hi Stephen,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:41:11PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >> Hi all
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 17:20:15 +0100
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Hi Paolo,
> On 18/03/2015 08:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:41:11PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
> >> vi
On 18/03/2015 08:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:41:11PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c between commit ae705930fca6 ("arm/arm64: KVM: Keep
>> elrsr/aisr
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:41:11PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c between commit ae705930fca6 ("arm/arm64: KVM: Keep
> elrsr/aisr in sync with software model") from Linus' tree and commi
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c between commit ae705930fca6 ("arm/arm64: KVM: Keep
elrsr/aisr in sync with software model") from Linus' tree and commit
71760950bf3d ("arm/arm64: KVM: add a common vgic_queue_irq_to_lr fn")
from the kvm-arm
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c between commit 1f2bb4acc125 ("arm/arm64: KVM:
Fix unaligned access bug on gicv2 access") from Linus' tree and commit
2df36a5dd679 ("arm/arm64: KVM: Fix BE accesses to GICv2 EISR and ELRSR
regs") from the
Hi Christoffer,
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:23:47 +0200 Christoffer Dall
wrote:
>
> Stephen, did you pick up the resolution provided by Marc for the gicv2
> fix patch so that it applies to tomorrow's next/kvmarm merge?
Yes, I have. You will need to produce the same for Linus eventually,
or do the m
On Thu, Jul 31 2014 at 03:23:47 PM, Christoffer Dall
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:15:40PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 31 2014 at 12:53:03 pm BST, Christoffer Dall
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christoffer,
>>
>> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> > wrote:
>> >
>>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:15:40PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31 2014 at 12:53:03 pm BST, Christoffer Dall
> wrote:
>
> Hi Christoffer,
>
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm
Hi all,
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:17:52 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Just send me a patch relative to today's linux-next (or merge
> 338eeb9b8318) and I will add it when I merge the kvm-arm tree on
> Monday. And don't forget to tell Linus :-)
^^
Actually, "tomorrow". I forgot what day
Hi Christoffer,
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:53:03 +0200 Christoffer Dall
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
> > virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c between commit 63afbe7a0ac1 ("kvm: arm64: vgic: fix
> > hyp pan
On Thu, Jul 31 2014 at 12:53:03 pm BST, Christoffer Dall
wrote:
Hi Christoffer,
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c between commit 63afbe7a0ac1 ("kvm:
On Thu, Jul 31 2014 at 7:30:04 am BST, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
Hi Stephen,
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c between commit 63afbe7a0ac1 ("kvm: arm64: vgic: fix
> hyp panic with 64k pages on juno platform") from Linus' tree and commit
> 8f18
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c between commit 63afbe7a0ac1 ("kvm: arm64: vgic: fix
hyp panic with 64k pages on juno platform") from Linus' tree and commit
8f186d522c69 ("KVM: ARM: vgic: split GICv2 backend from the main vgic
code") and ot
23 matches
Mail list logo