linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2019-05-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in: arch/arm64/configs/defconfig between commit: 7b0d021fbe41 ("arm64: defconfig: enable PCIE_ALTERA") from the arm-soc tree and commit: a9aa2a812255 ("arm64: defconfig: Enable CONFIG_SPI_IMX") from the imx-mxs tree.

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2019-04-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in: arch/arm64/configs/defconfig between commit: 7b0d021fbe41 ("arm64: defconfig: enable PCIE_ALTERA") from the arm-soc tree and commit: 2b4fd225df89 ("arm64: defconfig: Enable CONFIG_SPI_IMX") from the imx-mxs tree.

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2018-03-27 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 09:10:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Shawn, >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in: >> >> arch/arm/configs/mxs_defconfig >> >> between commit: >> >> e3e583e7a293 ("ARM: mxs_defc

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2018-03-27 Thread Shawn Guo
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 09:10:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in: > > arch/arm/configs/mxs_defconfig > > between commit: > > e3e583e7a293 ("ARM: mxs_defconfig: Re-sync defconfig") > > from the arm-soc tree and

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2018-03-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in: arch/arm/configs/mxs_defconfig between commit: e3e583e7a293 ("ARM: mxs_defconfig: Re-sync defconfig") from the arm-soc tree and commit: 8bc2c29b550c ("ARM: mxs_defconfig: Re-sync defconfig") from the imx-mxs tree

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2017-10-30 Thread Mark Brown
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-tx6q-11x0-mb7.dts arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-tx53-x13x.dts arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-tx6u-811x.dts arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-icore-rqs.dts arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-tx6q-1110.dts arch/arm/boot/dt

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2015-05-31 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig between commit 8064887e02fd ("ARM: vf610: enable Cortex-M4 configuration on Vybrid SoC") from the arm-soc tree and commit ef6c578329c7 ("ARM: imx: imx7d requires anatop") from the imx-mxs tree. I fi

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2015-05-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig between commit 8064887e02fd ("ARM: vf610: enable Cortex-M4 configuration on Vybrid SoC") from the arm-soc tree and commit aff62955b27b ("ARM: imx: add msl support for imx7d") from the imx-mxs tree.

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2015-01-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnd, On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:18:32 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > There is an extraneous '\' character behind imx6sx-sdb.dtb now, which caused > build errors for me. We should soon be able to merge the other branches into > arm-soc to avoid the entire set of merge conflicts, until then please

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2015-01-13 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 13 January 2015 11:16:36 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > - imx6q-tx6q-1110.dtb \ > - imx6sl-evk.dtb \ > + imx6q-tx6q-1110.dtb > +dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6SL) += \ > + imx6sl-evk.dtb > +dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6SX) += \ > + imx6sx-sabreauto.dtb \ > imx6sx-sdb.dtb

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2015-01-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile between commit 6f1650f15bc4 ("ARM: dts: Only build dtb if associated Arch and/or SoC is enabled") from the arm-soc tree and commit 99fc5ba0bfb6 ("ARM: dts: imx6sx: add i.mx6sx sabreauto board suppor

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the tree

2014-06-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig between commit e49d9b375628 ("ARM: Remove ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ config option") from the arm-soc tree and commit 7de46855b1e7 ("ARM: imx5: move SOC_IMX5 and SOC_IMX51 into 'Device tree only'") from the im

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2014-03-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig between commits ddb902cc3459 ("ARM: centralize common multi-platform kconfig options") and 37dff0825611 ("ARM: imx6: introduce CONFIG_SOC_IMX6 for i.MX6 common stuff") from the arm-soc tree and commi

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2014-02-19 Thread Shawn Guo
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:42:42AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got conflicts in > arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile and arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h between commit > 28a9f3b078c5 ("ARM: imx6: build pm-imx6q.c independently of CONFIG_PM") > fro

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2014-02-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got conflicts in arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile and arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h between commit 28a9f3b078c5 ("ARM: imx6: build pm-imx6q.c independently of CONFIG_PM") from the arm-soc tree and commits 8dd751932545 ("ARM: imx: add suspend in ocram s

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm tree

2014-01-28 Thread Shawn Guo
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 01:25:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:18:06 +0800 Shawn Guo wrote: > > > > I will rebase my branch on v3.14-rc1 once it's out. > > Um, does that mean that all that stuff is *not* destined for v3.14? ... Yes, Stephen. That's the

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm tree

2014-01-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:18:06 +0800 Shawn Guo wrote: > > I will rebase my branch on v3.14-rc1 once it's out. Um, does that mean that all that stuff is *not* destined for v3.14? ... -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au pgpngr0ewErs2.pgp Description: PG

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm tree

2014-01-28 Thread Shawn Guo
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 01:13:10AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:35:14AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Shawn, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in > > arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile between commits 208d7baf8085 ("ARM: imx:

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm tree

2014-01-28 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:35:14AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile between commits 208d7baf8085 ("ARM: imx: > initial SolidRun HummingBoard support") and 971488f1149f ("ARM: imx: > initial So

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm tree

2014-01-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile between commits 208d7baf8085 ("ARM: imx: initial SolidRun HummingBoard support") and 971488f1149f ("ARM: imx: initial SolidRun Cubox-i support") from the arm tree and various commits from the imx-mx

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm tree

2014-01-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got conflicts in arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile, arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-hummingboard.dts, arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-microsom-ar8035.dtsi and arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-microsom.dtsi between commits 728d5599f5d8 ("ARM: imx: initial SolidRun Hummin

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the tree

2014-01-05 Thread Olof Johansson
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts between commit 8f568b496dd9 ("ARM: > imx: Explicitly pass the active level of the PHY reset") from the arm-soc > tree and c

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the tree

2014-01-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts between commit 8f568b496dd9 ("ARM: imx: Explicitly pass the active level of the PHY reset") from the arm-soc tree and commit e5a5af250568 ("ARM: dts: imx: sabrelite: add Dual Lite/Solo su

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2014-01-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-apf51.dts between commit 8f568b496dd9 ("ARM: imx: Explicitly pass the active level of the PHY reset") from the arm-soc tree and commit 756c8d5762c2 ("ARM: dts: i.MX51 boards: Switch to use standard GPI

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2014-01-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27-phytec-phycore-som.dtsi between commit 8f568b496dd9 ("ARM: imx: Explicitly pass the active level of the PHY reset") from the arm-soc tree and commit 208d5b9c2c71 ("ARM: dts: i.MX27 boards: Switch to us

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree

2013-10-25 Thread Thierry Reding
Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c caused by commits 6aec339 (PM / OPP: rename header to linux/pm_opp.h) and 0794410 (imx: add PCI fixup for PEX860X on Gateworks board). I fixed it up (see below). Please verify that the resolutio

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree

2013-10-09 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Thierry, On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got conflicts in > > arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx51-imx53.c > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c > > caused by commits 0efe995 (ARM: mach-imx: clk-imx51-imx53: Retrieve base

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree

2013-10-09 Thread Thierry Reding
Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got conflicts in arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx51-imx53.c arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c caused by commits 0efe995 (ARM: mach-imx: clk-imx51-imx53: Retrieve base address and irq from dt), d2b36f6 (ARM: imx: replace imx6q_restart() with mxc_r

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree

2013-10-08 Thread Shawn Guo
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got conflicts in > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c > > caused by commits 4d9d18a (ARM: imx: remove custom .init_time hook), > e709f38 (ARM: imx6: report soc info via soc device) a

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree

2013-10-08 Thread Thierry Reding
Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got conflicts in arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c caused by commits 4d9d18a (ARM: imx: remove custom .init_time hook), e709f38 (ARM: imx6: report soc info via soc device) and 3087d32 (ARM: imx6q: use common soc revision helpers). I fixed it up (

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm tree

2013-07-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/Kconfig.debug between commit 5e33abe38413 ("ARM: debug: move PL01X debug include into arch/arm/include/debug/") from the arm tree and commit d1814df976f2 ("ARM: imx: add low-level debug for vybrid") from the imx-mxs

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2013-06-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/Kconfig.debug between commit 828989ad87af ("ARM: keystone: Add minimal TI Keystone platform support") from the arm-soc tree and commit 34e8a16b944e ("ARM: imx: enable low-level debug support for imx6sl") from the imx

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2013-06-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c between commit 6aaab172c99b ("ARM: mxs: remove the .map_io declaration") from the arm-soc tree and commit fe7149dfa886 ("ARM: mxs: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description") from the imx

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2013-04-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c between commit e8094b2c1712 ("ARM i.MX6: Fix ldb_di clock selection") from the arm-soc tree and commit 8034cf45ac38 ("ARM i.MX6q: Add audio/video PLL post dividers for i.MX6q rev 1.1") from the i

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the pinctrl tree

2013-04-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in drivers/pinctrl/Makefile between commit 62194200e5e3 ("pinctrl: remove pxa pinctrl driver") from the pinctrl tree and commit b8979245b6ff ("pinctrl: add pinctrl driver for imx6dl") from the imx-mxs tree. I fixed it up (see b

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the pm tree

2013-04-03 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 4 April 2013 10:48, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/mach-imx/cpufreq.c between commits b43a7ffbf33b ("cpufreq: > Notify all policy->cpus in cpufreq_notify_transition()") and eb2f50ff93f0 > ("cpufreq: drivers: Remove unnecessary

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the pm tree

2013-04-03 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/mach-imx/cpufreq.c between commits b43a7ffbf33b ("cpufreq: Notify all policy->cpus in cpufreq_notify_transition()") and eb2f50ff93f0 ("cpufreq: drivers: Remove unnecessary assignments of policy-> members") from the p

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2013-04-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in drivers/clocksource/Makefile between commit 275786b71d42 ("ARM: sirf: use clocksource_of infrastructure") from the arm-soc tree and commit c74512bf83f3 ("ARM: mxs: move timer driver into drivers/clocksource") from the imx-mxs

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2013-04-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/Kconfig.debug between commit 266c347924f5 ("ARM: nomadik: move debugmacro to debug includes") from the arm-soc tree and commit 11c6f861cf3a ("ARM: mxs: rename debug-macro.S for multiplatform build") from the imx-mxs

linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree

2013-03-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Shawn, Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c between commit da4a686a2cfb ("ARM: smp_twd: convert to use CLKSRC_OF init") from the arm-soc tree and commit 371287432334 ("ARM: imx: enable anatop suspend/resume") from the imx-mxs tree. I fix