Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2020-12-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:12:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:43:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in: > > > > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > fs/f2fs/super.c > > > > between c

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2020-12-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:43:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in: > > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > fs/f2fs/super.c > > between commit: > > 5c0602188dc7 ("f2fs: fix kbytes written stat for multi-device case") >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2020-12-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:43:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > diff --cc fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > index 14ba1519639e,54a1905af052.. > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > @@@ -1385,27 -1385,6 +1385,26 @@@ static void commit_checkpoint(struct f2 > f2fs_

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2020-12-02 Thread Chao Yu
On 2020/12/3 11:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in: fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c fs/f2fs/f2fs.h fs/f2fs/super.c between commit: 5c0602188dc7 ("f2fs: fix kbytes written stat for multi-device case") from the f2fs tree and commits

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2020-12-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in: fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c fs/f2fs/f2fs.h fs/f2fs/super.c between commit: 5c0602188dc7 ("f2fs: fix kbytes written stat for multi-device case") from the f2fs tree and commits: 8446fe9255be ("block: switch partition lookup

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2016-11-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/f2fs/segment.c between commit: 792b84b74b54 ("f2fs: support multiple devices") from the f2fs tree and commit: 70fd76140a6c ("block,fs: use REQ_* flags directly") from the block tree. I fixed it up (see below) an

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2016-07-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/f2fs/data.c between commits: 19a5f5e2ef37 ("f2fs: drop any block plugging") 52763a4b7a21 ("f2fs: detect host-managed SMR by feature flag") 78682f794479 ("f2fs: fix to avoid reading out encrypted data in page cache

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2016-06-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/f2fs/data.c between commit: 6d63ed97a1f2 ("f2fs: detect host-managed SMR by feature flag") from the f2fs tree and commit: 04d328defd06 ("f2fs: use bio op accessors") from the block tree. I fixed it up (see below

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2016-06-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 13:26:09 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in: > > fs/f2fs/data.c > fs/f2fs/segment.c > > between commits: > > 0a87f664d1ad ("f2fs: detect congestion of flush command issues") > 19a5f5e2ef37 ("f2fs: dr

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2016-06-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in: fs/f2fs/data.c fs/f2fs/segment.c between commits: 0a87f664d1ad ("f2fs: detect congestion of flush command issues") 19a5f5e2ef37 ("f2fs: drop any block plugging") from the f2fs tree and commits: 4e49ea4a3d27 ("bloc

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2015-07-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/f2fs/data.c between commit: 8e5b935bf1ce ("f2fs: maintain extent cache in separated file") from the f2fs tree and commit: 4246a0b63bd8 ("block: add a bi_error field to struct bio") from the block tree. I fixed i

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2014-01-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in fs/f2fs/data.c between various commits from the f2fs tree and commits 2c30c71bd653 ("block: Convert various code to bio_for_each_segment()") and 4f024f3797c4 ("block: Abstract out bvec iterator") from the block tree. I fixed it

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2013-12-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in fs/f2fs/data.c between commits from the f2fs tree and commits 2c30c71bd653 ("block: Convert various code to bio_for_each_segment()") and 4f024f3797c4 ("block: Abstract out bvec iterator") from the block tree. I fixed it up (I h

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2013-12-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in fs/f2fs/data.c between commit 8758e549e105 ("f2fs: add unlikely() macro for compiler more aggressively") from the f2fs tree and commit 2c30c71bd653 ("block: Convert various code to bio_for_each_segment()") from the block tree.

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2013-12-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in fs/f2fs/data.c and fs/f2fs/segment.c between commits 0626804cd9a6 ("f2fs: remove the own bi_private allocation") and 899d7625d85a ("f2fs: refactor bio-related operations") from the f2fs tree and commits 2c30c71bd653 ("block: Conv

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2013-11-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in include/trace/events/f2fs.h between commit 4bfc388c73a1 ("f2fs: adds a tracepoint for f2fs_submit_read_bio") from the tree and commit 4f024f3797c4 ("block: Abstract out bvec iterator") from the block tree. I fixed it up (see b

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2013-11-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in fs/f2fs/segment.c between commit a79ad49b87f4 ("f2fs: introduce a bio array for per-page write bios") from the f2fs tree and commit 4f024f3797c4 ("block: Abstract out bvec iterator") from the block tree. I fixed it up (see belo

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

2013-10-31 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in fs/f2fs/segment.c between commit cc7b1bb17367 ("f2fs: avoid allocating failure in bio_alloc") from the f2fs tree and commit ed2d2f9a8265 ("block: Abstract out bvec iterator") from the block tree. I fixed it up (see below) and c