linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2019-02-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/extent_io.c between commit: 2ce8afc500de ("btrfs: extent_io: Kill the forward declaration of flush_write_bio") from the btrfs-kdave tree and commit: c3a7ce738009 ("btrfs: use mp_bvec_last_segment to get bio

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2017-06-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/disk-io.c between commits: 21445903e814 ("btrfs: preallocate device flush bio") 56305f3eb397 ("btrfs: move dev stats accounting out of wait_dev_flush") from the btrfs-kdave tree and commit: 4e4cbee93d56 ("b

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2017-06-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/inode.c between commits: c6100a4b4e3d ("Btrfs: replace tree->mapping with tree->private_data") 725130bac585 ("Btrfs: use bio_clone_bioset_partial to simplify DIO submit") 3892ac9086a8 ("Btrfs: unify naming o

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2017-06-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/inode.c between commits: b6f68032afbe ("Btrfs: replace tree->mapping with tree->private_data") b7da91627746 ("Btrfs: use bio_clone_bioset_partial to simplify DIO submit") 170a8768b6b7 ("Btrfs: unify naming o

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2017-06-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in: fs/btrfs/extent_io.c fs/btrfs/extent_io.h between commit: b6f68032afbe ("Btrfs: replace tree->mapping with tree->private_data") from the btrfs-kdave tree and commit: 4e4cbee93d56 ("block: switch bios to blk_status_t

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2017-06-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in: fs/btrfs/disk-io.c fs/btrfs/disk-io.h between commits: b6f68032afbe ("Btrfs: replace tree->mapping with tree->private_data") 9035b5dbc576 ("btrfs: btrfs_io_bio_alloc never fails, skip error handling") from the btrfs-

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2017-06-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/compression.c between commit: c1045c6859c1 ("btrfs: opencode trivial compressed_bio_alloc, simplify error handling") from the btrfs-kdave tree and commit: 4e4cbee93d56 ("block: switch bios to blk_status_t")

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2016-11-18 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:23:01PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:49:29PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > > doesn't look correct, if bio_readpage_error() is called from the > > ->bi_end_io() handler. bi_size is generally zeroed at that time. > > At least some of these bio

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2016-11-17 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:49:29PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > doesn't look correct, if bio_readpage_error() is called from the > ->bi_end_io() handler. bi_size is generally zeroed at that time. At least some of these bios are magic btrfs-internal ones that never reach the block layer. But I don'

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2016-11-16 Thread Jens Axboe
On 11/16/2016 07:01 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in: fs/btrfs/extent_io.c fs/btrfs/inode.c between commit: 01a1400f8545 ("btrfs: only check bio size to see if a repair bio should have the failfast flag") from the btrfs-k

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2016-11-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in: fs/btrfs/extent_io.c fs/btrfs/inode.c between commit: 01a1400f8545 ("btrfs: only check bio size to see if a repair bio should have the failfast flag") from the btrfs-kdave tree and commit: 70fd76140a6c ("block,fs:

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2016-07-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/volumes.h between commit: 26112f7f4726 ("btrfs: take an fs_info parameter directly when the root is not used otherwise") from the btrfs-kdave tree and commit: 81a75f6781de ("btrfs: use bio fields for op and

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2016-07-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/volumes.c between commit: 26112f7f4726 ("btrfs: take an fs_info parameter directly when the root is not used otherwise") from the btrfs-kdave tree and commit: 4e49ea4a3d27 ("block/fs/drivers: remove rw argu

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2016-07-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/inode.c between commit: b286384aac32 ("btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, add fs_info convenience variables") 26112f7f4726 ("btrfs: take an fs_info parameter directly when the root is not used otherwise") 71251

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2016-07-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c between commit: b286384aac32 ("btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, add fs_info convenience variables") [again, no commiter Signed-off-by] from the btrfs-kdave tree and commit: b3d3fa519905 ("btrfs:

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2016-07-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/disk-io.c between commit: b286384aac32 ("btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, add fs_info convenience variables") 26112f7f4726 ("btrfs: take an fs_info parameter directly when the root is not used otherwise") from

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2016-07-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/compression.c between commit: 26112f7f4726 ("btrfs: take an fs_info parameter directly when the root is not used otherwise") [This commit has no Signed-off-by from its committer :-(] d42b410c1511 ("Btrfs: fix

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

2016-06-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/compression.c between commit: edf0e062aa6f ("Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_submit_compressed_write") from the btrfs-kdave tree and commit: 81a75f6781de ("btrfs: use bio fields for op and flags") from the block