Hi all,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
this warning:
Documentation/driver-api/target:19:
drivers/target/target_core_transport.c:1661: WARNING: Block quote ends without
a blank line; unexpected unindent.
Introduced by commit
750a1d93f905 ("scsi: tar
Hi Stephen
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Sent: 25 June 2020 09:11
> To: James Bottomley
> Cc: Linux Next Mailing List ; Linux Kernel
Mailing
> List ; Alim Akhtar
;
> Martin K. Petersen ; Seungwon Jeon
>
> Subject: linux-next: build warning a
Hi all,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.o
Introduced by commit
55f4b1f73631 ("scsi: ufs: ufs-exynos: Add UFS host support for Exynos SoCs")
(not sure w
Hi all,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h:8,
from include/linux/pci.h:2408,
from drivers/scsi/mvumi.c:13:
drivers/scsi/mvumi.c: In function 'mvum
On 05/30/2019 08:36 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c: In function 'ibmvscsi_work':
> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c:2151:5: warning: 'rc' may be
On 05/30/2019 08:36 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c: In function 'ibmvscsi_work':
> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c:2151:5: warning: 'rc' may be
Hi all,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c: In function 'ibmvscsi_work':
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c:2151:5: warning: 'rc' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 21:30 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 4/4/19 8:25 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c:2140:1: warning:
> > 'lpfc_
On 4/4/19 8:25 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c:2140:1: warning: 'lpfc_nvme_lport_unreg_wait'
defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
lpfc_nvme_lport_unr
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c:2140:1: warning: 'lpfc_nvme_lport_unreg_wait'
defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
lpfc_nvme_lport_unreg_wait(struct lpfc_vport *vport,
^~~
Hi James,
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 21:54:03 -0700 James Bottomley
wrote:
>
> It's the merge commit ... it was obviously the wrong choice; I'll fix
> it.
OK, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpS8HDlYzZFg.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 15:50 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c: In function
> 'lpfc_debugfs_nodelist_open':
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c: In function 'lpfc_debugfs_nodelist_open':
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:706:17: warning: 'nrport' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Wma
Jens,
>> Message-Id: <20180706201920.2185565-1-a...@arndb.de>
>> Subject: [PATCH] [v2] sbitmap, scsi/target: add seq_file forward
>> declaration
>> Martin didn't reply and it's not yet in his tree, although I'm sure it
>> will be soon.
Been out on vacation. I thought I committed it but I
On 7/10/18 8:26 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 08:22 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 7/10/18 8:14 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 08:09 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 7/10/18 1:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
> I am still seeing these warni
On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 08:22 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 7/10/18 8:14 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 08:09 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On 7/10/18 1:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > > I am still seeing these warnings ...
> > >
> > > Martin queued up the
On 7/10/18 8:14 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 08:09 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 7/10/18 1:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> [...]
>>> I am still seeing these warnings ...
>>
>> Martin queued up the forward declaration patch for this one, not sure
>> why it isn't showing up in
On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 08:09 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 7/10/18 1:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
[...]
> > I am still seeing these warnings ...
>
> Martin queued up the forward declaration patch for this one, not sure
> why it isn't showing up in the scsi tree yet.
All the trees are fully up to
On 7/10/18 1:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:29:10 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allyesconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>> In file included from include/target/target_core_base.h:7:0,
>
Hi all,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:29:10 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) produced this warning:
>
> In file included from include/target/target_core_base.h:7:0,
> from drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c:
Long,
> I will fix this by moving those data structure to kmalloc pre-allocated
> when channel is first created.
Sounds good. I'll drop patch 3 for now and wait for you to resubmit.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
> Subject: linux-next: build warning after merge of the scsi tree
>
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c: In function 'storvsc_do_io':
> drive
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c: In function 'storvsc_do_io':
drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c:1402:1: warning: the frame size of 2216 bytes is
larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
}
^
I
On Thu, 04/06 14:04, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> In file included from include/linux/list.h:8:0,
> from include/linux/module.h:9,
> from driver
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/list.h:8:0,
from include/linux/module.h:9,
from drivers/scsi/sd.c:35:
drivers/scsi/sd.c: In function 'sd_revalidate
> "Stephen" == Stephen Rothwell writes:
Stephen,
Stephen> drivers/scsi/hpsa.c: In function 'hpsa_slave_alloc':
Stephen> drivers/scsi/hpsa.c:2033:5: warning: 'sd' may be used
Stephen> uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Stephen> if (!sd)
Stephen> ^
Stephen> Introduc
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/scsi/hpsa.c: In function 'hpsa_slave_alloc':
drivers/scsi/hpsa.c:2033:5: warning: 'sd' may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
if (!sd)
^
Introd
> "Bryant" == Bryant G Ly writes:
Bryant> On 9/12/16, 11:15 PM, "Stephen Rothwell" wrote:
>> Hi James,
>>
>> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allyesconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c: In function
>> 'ibmvscsis_rdm
On 9/12/16, 11:15 PM, "Stephen Rothwell" wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c: In function 'ibmvscsis_rdma':
> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c: In function 'ibmvscsis_rdma':
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:3190:20: warning: unused variable
'srp' [-Wunused-variable]
struct sr
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 07:21:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c: In function 'ibmvfc_queuecommand_lck':
> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c:1618:
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c: In function 'ibmvfc_queuecommand_lck':
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c:1618:5: warning: unused variable 'tag'
[-Wunused-variable]
u8 tag[2];
^
Intr
On 9/4/2013 2:48 PM, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote:
On 9/2/2013 1:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c: In function 'ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler':
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshc
On 9/2/2013 1:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c: In function 'ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler':
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:2740:3: warning: 'flush_work_sync' is deprec
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c: In function 'ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler':
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:2740:3: warning: 'flush_work_sync' is deprecated
(declared at /scratch/sfr/next/include/li
35 matches
Mail list logo
