Hi all,
After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from init/do_mounts.c:9:
include/linux/security.h: In function 'security_bprm_repopulate_creds':
include/linux/security.h:580:9: error: implicit declaration of function
'ca
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> In file included from include/linux/sched.h:16:0,
> from arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:14:
> include/linux/shm.h:17:35: error:
Hi Eric,
After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/sched.h:16:0,
from arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:14:
include/linux/shm.h:17:35: error: 'struct file' declared inside parameter l
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c: In function 'machine_process_ue_event':
> arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c:276:5: error: too many arguments to function
> 'memory_fai
Hi Eric,
After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c: In function 'machine_process_ue_event':
arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c:276:5: error: too many arguments to function
'memory_failure'
memory_failure(pfn, SIGBUS, 0)
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/pid_namespace.c: In function 'create_pid_namespace':
> kernel/pid_namespace.c:105:7: error: too many arguments to function
> 'in_userns'
> if
Hi Eric,
After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
kernel/pid_namespace.c: In function 'create_pid_namespace':
kernel/pid_namespace.c:105:7: error: too many arguments to function 'in_userns'
if (!in_userns(parent_pid_ns->user_ns, user_ns
Hi Eric,
After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allnoconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/kobject.h:21:0,
from include/linux/device.h:17,
from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:27,
from arch/powerpc/
Hi Eric,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:18:44 -0700 ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
> > After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > fs/namespace.c: In function 'new_mountpoint':
> > fs/na
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/namespace.c: In function 'new_mountpoint':
> fs/namespace.c:725:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'hash'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-decl
Hi Eric,
After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/namespace.c: In function 'new_mountpoint':
fs/namespace.c:725:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'hash'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
struct list_head *chain = moun
Hi Eric,
On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 15:15:17 -0800 ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
> > After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > fs/namespace.c: In function 'detach_mounts':
> > fs/nam
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 02:50:42PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Al was watching the conversation so I assumed that no answer to that
> request was sufficient to take these patches in my tree.
>
> I fully intend to take responsibility for these patches and work through
> whatever issues they ha
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/namespace.c: In function 'detach_mounts':
> fs/namespace.c:1340:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'br_write_lock' [-Werror=implicit-func
Christoph Hellwig writes:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 05:58:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> fs/namei.c: In function 'covered':
>> fs/namei.c:3528:2: error: too many a
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:27:32PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 05:58:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > fs/namei.c: In function 'cove
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 05:58:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/namei.c: In function 'covered':
> fs/namei.c:3528:2: error: too many arguments to function '__lookup_mnt'
>
Hi Eric,
After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/namespace.c: In function 'detach_mounts':
fs/namespace.c:1340:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'br_write_lock'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
br_write_lock(&vfsmou
Hi Eric,
After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/namei.c: In function 'covered':
fs/namei.c:3528:2: error: too many arguments to function '__lookup_mnt'
is_covered = d_mountpoint(dentry) && __lookup_mnt(mnt, dentry, 1);
^
Caused
Hi Eric,
After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
kernel/audit.c: In function 'audit_receive_msg':
kernel/audit.c:753:37: error: 'struct netlink_skb_parms' has no member named
'pid'
I missed the conflict between commit 35ce9888ad2a ("audit:
20 matches
Mail list logo
