On 3/11/21 8:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
>
> drivers/scsi/sg.c: In function 'sg_mk_kern_bio':
> drivers/scsi/sg.c:2958:17: error: 'BIO_MAX_PAGES' undeclared (first use in
>
Hi all,
After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/sg.c: In function 'sg_mk_kern_bio':
drivers/scsi/sg.c:2958:17: error: 'BIO_MAX_PAGES' undeclared (first use in this
function); did you mean 'BIO_MAX_VECS'?
2958 | if (bve
On 2021-01-27 2:01 a.m., Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 00:53:59 -0500 Douglas Gilbert
wrote:
On 2021-01-24 11:13 p.m., Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/sg.c: In
Hi all,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 00:53:59 -0500 Douglas Gilbert
wrote:
>
> On 2021-01-24 11:13 p.m., Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/scsi/sg.c: In function 'sg_find_srp_by_id':
On 2021-01-24 11:13 p.m., Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/sg.c: In function 'sg_find_srp_by_id':
drivers/scsi/sg.c:2908:4: error: expected '}' before 'else'
2908 |else
Hi all,
After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/sg.c: In function 'sg_find_srp_by_id':
drivers/scsi/sg.c:2908:4: error: expected '}' before 'else'
2908 |else
|^~~~
drivers/scsi/sg.c:2902:16: warning: unused
On 12/8/20 9:55 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
Yes, that certainly is the proper fix. It's all to easy to miss these
issues that depend on your kernel configuration.
Bart, can you fold it into a new version of the patch?
Sure, I will do that.
Thanks,
Bart.
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:38:59PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:28:53 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64
> > defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/i
Hi Christoph,
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:30:39 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:28:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64
> > defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/int
Hi all,
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:28:53 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64
> defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel-nand-controller.c:17:10: fatal error:
> linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h: No such file or dire
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:28:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64
> defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel-nand-controller.c:17:10: fatal error:
> linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h: No such file or directory
Hi all,
After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64
defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel-nand-controller.c:17:10: fatal error:
linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h: No such file or directory
17 | #include
| ^~
Caused by commit
> >> ERROR: modpost: "exynos_ufs_dump_info" [drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.ko]
> undefined!
> >> ERROR: modpost: "exynos_ufs_init_dbg" [drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.ko]
> undefined!
> >> ERROR: modpost: "exynos_ufs_cmd_log_start" [drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-
> exynos.ko] undefined!
>
> *sigh* sorry about t
Stephen,
>> ERROR: modpost: "exynos_ufs_dump_info" [drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: modpost: "exynos_ufs_init_dbg" [drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.ko]
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: modpost: "exynos_ufs_cmd_log_start" [drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.ko]
>> undefined!
*sigh* sorry
Hi all,
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:30:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: modpost: "exynos_ufs_dump_info" [drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.ko]
> undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "exynos_ufs_init
Hi all,
After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: modpost: "exynos_ufs_dump_info" [drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.ko]
undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "exynos_ufs_init_dbg" [drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.ko]
undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "exynos_
Hi all,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:04:19 +0200 James Bottomley
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 21:33 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >
> > > > I have reverted that commit for today.
> > >
> > > This has now migrated to the scsi tree.
> >
> > I have a fix in my tree but I haven't pushed
On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 21:33 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Stephen,
>
> > > I have reverted that commit for today.
> >
> > This has now migrated to the scsi tree.
>
> I have a fix in my tree but I haven't pushed it yet.
It's upstream in both trees now.
James
Stephen,
>> I have reverted that commit for today.
>
> This has now migrated to the scsi tree.
I have a fix in my tree but I haven't pushed it yet.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Hi all,
On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:27:49 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c: In function 'tcm_qla2xxx_init_lport':
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c:1614:3: e
Hi all,
After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c: In function 'tcm_qla2xxx_init_lport':
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c:1614:3: error: implicit declaration of
function 'vzalloc'; did you mean 'kvzallo
Hi Stephen,
> On Mar 21, 2018, at 11:25 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c: In function 'qla24xx_async_gnnft_done':
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla
Hi Martin,
After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c: In function 'qla24xx_async_gnnft_done':
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c:3974:7: error: 'fc4type' undeclared (first use in
this function); did you mean 'fc
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:00:50PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> > I'm perfectly OK with taking it through the SCSI tree. Probably the
> > path of least resistance.
>
> Applied to 4.16/scsi-queue and rebased so it sits before Bart's patch.
Thank you! I have removed this patch from -rcu.
> I'm perfectly OK with taking it through the SCSI tree. Probably the
> path of least resistance.
Applied to 4.16/scsi-queue and rebased so it sits before Bart's patch.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Stephen,
>> I have to defer to you guys on that one. Left to myself, I will just
>> push it into the next merge window (as opposed to using my normal
>> process, which at this point would get it into the one following).
>>
>> So please let me know how you would like to proceed.
>
> Clearly, it
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 07:34:39AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:40:38 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:30:03PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > However, what's not clear to me is through which tree this patch should be
Hi all,
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:40:38 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney"
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:30:03PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > However, what's not clear to me is through which tree this patch should be
> > sent to Linus? Should the above patch be sent as a v4.15-rc fix or should
>
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:30:03PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 20:42 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:25:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 03:59:30 + Bart Van Assche
> > > wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > commit cde4691a3
On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 20:42 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:25:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 03:59:30 + Bart Van Assche
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 14:57 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > After merging the scsi-mkp tree,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:25:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> [cc'ing some RCU people ...]
>
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 03:59:30 + Bart Van Assche
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 14:57 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-ne
Hi Bart,
[cc'ing some RCU people ...]
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 03:59:30 + Bart Van Assche
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 14:57 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > ERROR: "init_rcu_head"
On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 14:57 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "init_rcu_head" [drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "destroy_rcu_head" [drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.ko] undefined!
>
> C
Hi Martin,
After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "init_rcu_head" [drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "destroy_rcu_head" [drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
ac90420f17c9 ("scsi: core: Ensure that the
Hi Martin,
After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: ".nvmet_fc_rcv_fcp_req" [drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
a8cf5dfeb4d8 ("scsi: lpfc: Added recovery logic for running out of NVMET IO
context resource
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:54 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:06:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <
> s...@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:41:19 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <
> > s...@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the scsi-mkp
Hi James,
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:06:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:41:19 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > ERROR: ".nvme_fc_unregister_remotepor
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017, 2:19pm -, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> *sigh*
>
> Chad: Please fix these up ASAP.
>
>
Just submitted a patch to the list to fix this up. I tested against the
mainline which has the net-next merge and the kref refcount_t conversion
to verify.
> "Stephen" == Stephen Rothwell writes:
Stephen,
Stephen> Caused by commit
Stephen> 61d8658b4a43 ("scsi: qedf: Add QLogic FastLinQ offload FCoE
Stephen> driver framework")
Stephen> being rebased on top of commit
Stephen> 10383aea2f44 ("kref: Implement 'struct kref' using
Stephen>
Hi Martin,
After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_io.c: In function 'qedf_trace_io':
drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_io.c:1001:33: error: passing argument 1 of 'atomic_read'
from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompati
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 16:10 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > > > > > "Stephen" == Stephen Rothwell
> > > > > > writes:
>
> Stephen,
>
> Stephen> Unfortunately, you have just merged this build failure into
> the
> Stephen> scsi tree :-(
>
> Stephen> James Smart has posted a fix:
>
> Stephen
Hi James,
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:41:19 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: ".nvme_fc_unregister_remoteport" [drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: ".nvme_fc_unregister_local
> "James" == James Bottomley writes:
James> Perhaps it would be nice to rebase so we don't get bisect into a
James> build failure.
My plan was to start 4.11/scsi-fixes based on linus/master. I need block
and net to satisfy dependencies for the remaining patches in the queue.
--
Martin K. P
> "Stephen" == Stephen Rothwell writes:
Stephen,
Stephen> Unfortunately, you have just merged this build failure into the
Stephen> scsi tree :-(
Stephen> James Smart has posted a fix:
Stephen> "[PATCH v2] lpfc: add missing Kconfig NVME dependencies"
I'll get the queued up shortly.
--
Hi Martin,
After merging the scsi-mkp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: ".nvme_fc_unregister_remoteport" [drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.ko] undefined!
ERROR: ".nvme_fc_unregister_localport" [drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.ko] undefined!
ERROR: ".nvmet_fc_rcv_ls_re
45 matches
Mail list logo
