Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

rt pinctrl and gpio driver for Rockchip SoCs. > > config PINCTRL_RZA1 > bool "Renesas RZ/A1 gpio and pinctrl driver" > > > > From: Linus Walleij > Date: 2021-03-05 08:43 > To: jay...@rock-chips.com > CC: Stephen Rothwell; Linux Kernel Mailing List

Re: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 1:13 AM jay...@rock-chips.com wrote: > Could you show me the issue log ? It's attached to Stephen's original mail in this thread. Yours, Linus Walleij

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:16:17 +0100 Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:12 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig ) failed like this: > > > > > > Presumably caused by commit > > > > c9e84d46cc03

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:12 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig ) failed like this: > > > Presumably caused by commit > > c9e84d46cc03 ("pinctrl: rockchip: make driver be tristate module") > > I have used the pinctrl tree

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi all, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig ) failed like this: Presumably caused by commit c9e84d46cc03 ("pinctrl: rockchip: make driver be tristate module") I have used the pinctrl tree from next-20210303 for today. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 08:41:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: Thanks for the message. This should be fixed already. Best regards, Krzysztof

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi all, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: In file included from include/linux/wait.h:9, from include/linux/pid.h:6, from include/linux/sched.h:14, from include/linux/ratelimit.h:6,

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 4:10 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:50:16 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > ERROR: modpost: "irq_gc_set_wake" [drivers/pi

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi all, On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:50:16 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > ERROR: modpost: "irq_gc_set_wake" [drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.ko] > undefined! > > Caused by commit

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi all, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: ERROR: modpost: "irq_gc_set_wake" [drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.ko] undefined! Caused by commit 6c684f5e79ea ("pinctrl: rockchip: make driver be tristate module") I have reverted tha

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:01 AM Hanks Chen wrote: > On Fri, 2020-07-17 at 17:16 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Caused by commit > > > > e6f744c6ad4f ("pinctrl: mediatek: add pinctrl support for MT6779 SoC") > > > > Forgot to include module.h (since it is tristate in Kconfig) or init.h? > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Fri, 2020-07-17 at 17:16 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt6779.c:783:1: warning: data definition has > no type or storage class > 783 | arch_

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi all, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt6779.c:783:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class 783 | arch_initcall(mt6779_pinctrl_init); | ^ drivers/pinctrl/mediat

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:16 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c: In function 'st_pctl_dt_parse_groups': > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c:1212:15: error: implicit declarat

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi all, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c: In function 'st_pctl_dt_parse_groups': drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c:1212:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_get_named_gpio'; did you mean 'of_get

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 10:00:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> >> After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm >> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: >> >> drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c: In function 'pl061_ir

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

> Hi Linus, > > On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 10:00:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> >> After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm >> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: >> >> drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c: In function 'pl061_irq_set_wake': >> drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c:280:28: error:

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On 2016-12-06 23:46, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 23:27:48 +0100 Peter Rosin wrote: >> >> The bug you are referring to is in the gpio tree, not pinctrl. >> That had me confused for a while, and is the reason I'm writing >> this. Maybe the next person need not be conf

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Peter, On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 23:27:48 +0100 Peter Rosin wrote: > > The bug you are referring to is in the gpio tree, not pinctrl. > That had me confused for a while, and is the reason I'm writing > this. Maybe the next person need not be confused... Part of the gpio tree has been merged into the

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 10:00:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c: In function 'pl061_irq_set_wake': > drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c:280:28: error: 'struct gpio_

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c: In function 'pl061_irq_set_wake': drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c:280:28: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member named 'irq_parent' return irq_set_irq_wake(gc->ir

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Laxman, this must be due to one of the two top commits for tegra: commit 1d18a3f0f0809f6c71f1f6e9e268ee904ce0b588 "pinctrl: tegra: avoid parked_reg and parked_bank" commit b22ef2a0979f2b91cfeeabb086e4d665183a93a1 "pinctrl: tegra: Correctly check the supported configuration" Is it something you ca

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: In file included from include/linux/thread_info.h:11:0, from include/asm-generic/preempt.h:4, from arch/arm/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1,

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: Argh damned, I pushed a oneliner fix in accordance with Pramod's report. Sorry about the mess. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe

RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

gt; Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Pramod Kumar; > Ray Jui; Scott Branden > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree > > Hi Linus, > > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) f

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-iproc-gpio.c:640:50: warning: 'struct cygnus_gpio' declared inside parameter list static void iproc_gpio_unregister_pinconf(struct cygnus_gpio *chip)

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

] Sent: 18 December 2015 11:28 To: Pramod Kumar Cc: Linus Walleij; linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Ray Jui; Scott Branden Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree Hi Pramod, On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 05:34:58 + Pramod Kumar wrote: Hi Stephen/L

RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

December 2015 11:28 > To: Pramod Kumar > Cc: Linus Walleij; linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > Ray > Jui; Scott Branden > Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree > > Hi Pramod, > > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 05:34:58 +00

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Pramod, On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 05:34:58 + Pramod Kumar wrote: > > Hi Stephen/Linus, > > Please suggest us how could we fix this issue. I think you issue is different from what I reported, What I reported was caused by the addition of the dependency on COMPILE_TEST which allowed the driver t

RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

> Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Pramod Kumar; > Ray Jui; Scott Branden > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree > > Hi Linus, > > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-iproc-gpio.c: In function 'iproc_gpio_unregister_pinconf': drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-iproc-gpio.c:642:25: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type '

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Caused by commit >> >> 776180848b57 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller") >> >> I have used the pinctrl tree from next-20150924 for today. > > I am still getting this error. Sorry for slow fixing, I was travelling. I

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:34:10 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_gpio_irq_set_type': > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:17

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_gpio_irq_set_type': drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:170:3: error: implicit declaration of function '__irq_set_handler_locked'

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: Fixed already, hopefully. (Atleast the autobuilders are happy.) Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c: In function 'pinconf_generic_dump_pins': drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c:116:19: error: 'struct pinctrl_desc' has no member named 'num_dt_params' if (

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c:1194:43: error: array type has incomplete element type static const struct samsung_pin_bank_data exynos7_pin_banks0[] __initconst = {

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) > failed like this: > > drivers/pinctrl/sirf/pinctrl-sirf.c: In function 'sirfsoc_gpio_handle_irq': > drivers/pinctrl/sirf/pinctrl-sirf.c:5

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/pinctrl/sirf/pinctrl-sirf.c: In function 'sirfsoc_gpio_handle_irq': drivers/pinctrl/sirf/pinctrl-sirf.c:578:11: error: 'sgpio_chip' undeclared (first use in this function) Cau

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c:407:18: error: 'stid127_delays' undeclared here > (not in a function) > > Caused by commit cab6bf05bab5 ("pinctrl: st: add stid127 support"). Oh darn, I was waiting for an update of that patch but forgot. I

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c:407:18: error: 'stid127_delays' undeclared here (not in a function) Caused by commit cab6bf05bab5 ("pinctrl: st: add stid127 support"). I have used the pin

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > sound/soc/fsl/eukrea-tlv320.c:28:28: fatal error: asm/mach-types.h: No such > file or directory > #include >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 14:02:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > sound/soc/fsl/eukrea-tlv320.c:28:28: fatal error: asm/mach-types.h: No such > file or directory > #include >

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: sound/soc/fsl/eukrea-tlv320.c:28:28: fatal error: asm/mach-types.h: No such file or directory #include ^ Probably caused by commit 6bca8471566c ("pinctrl: sel

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-msm.c:103:21: error: 'pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_group' undeclared here (not in a function) .dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_group,

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus, After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-adi2.c:25:25: fatal error: asm/portmux.h: No such file or directory #include ^ Caused by commit e9a03add0c6e ("pinctrl: ADI PIN control d