From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:51:34 +1000
> I have added the following merge fix patch.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:43:06 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] net/core/devlink.c: remove new uninitialized_var() usage
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
Applie
Hi all,
After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
net/core/devlink.c: In function 'devlink_nl_port_function_attrs_put':
net/core/devlink.c:586:3: warning: parameter names (without types) in function
declaration
586 | int uninitialized_v
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 11:48:51PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fs/file.o: in function `__fd_install_received':
> file.c:(.text+0x1010): undefined reference to `
Hi all,
After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
failed like this:
x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fs/file.o: in function `__fd_install_received':
file.c:(.text+0x1010): undefined reference to `sock_from_file'
x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: file.c:(.text+0x104a): undefined reference
Hi Will,
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:09:18 +0100 Will Deacon wrote:
>
> I've pushed out Laura's fix to the arm64 for-next/core branch, so this
> should be resolved in the next next.
Thanks. I actually applied Laura's patch to today's linux-next as well.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpoExjvTlxUO.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 05:33:56PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 13:55:22 +0100 Will Deacon wrote:
> > Thanks, Stephen. I managed to reproduce this by merging for-next/kspp from
> > Kees's tree and for-next/core from the arm64 tree. The failure happens when
> > building the
Hi Laura,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 07:47:52AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 07/30/2018 12:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 13:55:22 +0100 Will Deacon wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 08:55:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>>Actually, it may have been caused by commit
On 07/30/2018 12:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 13:55:22 +0100 Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 08:55:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:06:47 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:02:07 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 13:55:22 +0100 Will Deacon wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 08:55:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:06:47 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:02:07 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 02:01:06PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 01:55:22PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 08:55:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:06:47 +1000 Stephe
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 02:01:06PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 01:55:22PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 08:55:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:06:47 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 01:55:22PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 08:55:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:06:47 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:02:07 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > After
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 08:55:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:06:47 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:02:07 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) f
Hi all,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:06:47 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:02:07 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > cc1: error: plugin stackleak_plugin should be s
Hi all,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:02:07 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> cc1: error: plugin stackleak_plugin should be specified before
> -fplugin-arg-stackleak_plugin-disable in the command line
Hi Kees,
After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
cc1: error: plugin stackleak_plugin should be specified before
-fplugin-arg-stackleak_plugin-disable in the command line
Maybe caused by commit
a8b9eaddb9c0 ("gcc-plugins: Add STACKLEAK plu
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Agreed. I guess we'll see you for round X when you get to general
> kmalloc annotating. :)
That should be "fun". :)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:43:47PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > Hi Kees,
> >
> > After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/compiler_ty
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/compiler_types.h:58:0,
> from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:2,
>
Hi Kees,
After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/compiler_types.h:58:0,
from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:2,
from include/linux/stddef.h:5,
from include/
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 8:33 PM, James Morris wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> >> >> Fixes: 8014370f1257 ("apparmor: move path_link mediation to using
> >> >> labels")
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
> >> > Acked-by: John Joh
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 8:33 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> >> Fixes: 8014370f1257 ("apparmor: move path_link mediation to using labels")
>> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
>> > Acked-by: John Johansen
>>
>> Hi James,
>>
>> Just a ping; this needs to get
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> Fixes: 8014370f1257 ("apparmor: move path_link mediation to using labels")
> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
> > Acked-by: John Johansen
>
> Hi James,
>
> Just a ping; this needs to get into -next to avoid build errors.
Surely Linus will resolve t
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:39 PM, John Johansen
wrote:
> On 06/19/2017 09:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> security/apparmor/file.c: In function 'aa_path_link':
>> security/apparmo
On 06/19/2017 10:39 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> security/apparmor/file.c: In function 'aa_path_link':
>> security/apparmor/
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> security/apparmor/file.c: In function 'aa_path_link':
> security/apparmor/file.c:475:23: error: positional initialization of fi
On 06/19/2017 09:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> security/apparmor/file.c: In function 'aa_path_link':
> security/apparmor/file.c:475:23: error: positional initialization of field in
Hi all,
After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
security/apparmor/file.c: In function 'aa_path_link':
security/apparmor/file.c:475:23: error: positional initialization of field in
'struct' declared with 'designated_init' attribute [-Werror=de
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:31:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kees,
>>
>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 20:20:47 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm so confused -- isn't this in next? All the build tests I did were
>> > a
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:31:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi Kees,
>
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 20:20:47 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > I'm so confused -- isn't this in next? All the build tests I did were
> > against yesterday's -next which includes this from what I can see...
>
Hi Kees,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 20:20:47 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>
> I'm so confused -- isn't this in next? All the build tests I did were
> against yesterday's -next which includes this from what I can see...
It is in next, but gets merged after the kspp tree ... so, this is when
inter-tree depende
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 11:30 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Kees,
>>
>> After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> In file included from include/linux/bitmap.h:8:0,
>>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git/ in the
> 4.13/scsi-queue and for-next branches. I think that's why Kees didn't
> include it but I get he needs to add that.
s/get/guess/
Or is that repo supposed to get pulled into next?
On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 11:30 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/bitmap.h:8:0,
> from include/linux/cpumask.h:11,
> fr
Hi Kees,
After merging the kspp tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/bitmap.h:8:0,
from include/linux/cpumask.h:11,
from arch/x86/include/asm/cpumask.h:4,
from arch/x86/include
35 matches
Mail list logo