On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 4:30 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c: In function 'xgpio_remove':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:275:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'pm_runtime_disable' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 275 | pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
Hi all,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c: In function 'xgpio_remove':
drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:275:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'pm_runtime_disable' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 1:38 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
Oops!
> I have applied the following patch for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 21:29:30 +1000
> Subject: [PA
Hi all,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/asm-generic/gpio.h:13,
from include/linux/gpio.h:62,
from include/linux/of_gpio.h:16,
from arch/powerpc/platf
Hi all,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c: In function 'gpmc_probe_generic_child':
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:2174:9: error: type of formal parameter 4 is
incomplete
0);
^
Caused by commi
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy" [drivers/gpio/gpio-lpc18xx.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
5ddabfe8d3de ("gpio: lpc18xx: add GPIO pin interrupt controller support")
I have used the g
2017-11-13 20:33 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell :
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:20:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from i
Hi all,
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:20:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible
> pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:50:31 +0100 Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>>
>> I applied this patch to the GPIO tree, I guess it is the right thing
>> to do at this point.
>
> Umm, you can't really validly apply my merge fix patch to the gp
Hi Linus,
On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:50:31 +0100 Linus Walleij
wrote:
>
> I applied this patch to the GPIO tree, I guess it is the right thing
> to do at this point.
Umm, you can't really validly apply my merge fix patch to the gpio tree
without merging in part of the tip tree (it will generate, at
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible
> pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer
Hi Stephen,
2017-11-02 14:20 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell :
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible
> pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-point
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible
pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
.activate = uniphier_gpio_irq_domain_activate,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> It looks like those '(' ')' chars are not what they seem ...
No the owls are not what they seem. I went in and fixed the
unicode weirdness, thanks!
Pretty hard to see this one since I can't see it.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:09:34 +1000
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_irq_set_type':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:291:2: error: stray '\357' i
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_irq_set_type':
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:291:2: error: stray '\357' in program
if (type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
^
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:2
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> orion5x_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c:1062: undefined reference to
> `__devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk'
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c:1078: undefined refe
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
orion5x_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c:1062: undefined reference to
`__devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk'
drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c:1078: undefined reference to
`__devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk'
Caused by commit
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c: In function 'asc_set_termios':
> drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c:578:12: error: implicit declarat
Hi Lee,
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:48:54 + Lee Jones wrote:
>
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi Linus,
>
> I believe this patch would need to go in via Greg's tree.
Except his tree does not have the rename and extra arguments for
devm_get_gpiod_from_child(), so it can't
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:48:54 +
Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi Linus,
>
> I believe this patch would need to go in via Greg's tree.
>
> (see below)
>
> > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed lik
On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
I believe this patch would need to go in via Greg's tree.
(see below)
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c: In function 'asc_set_termios':
>
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c: In function 'asc_set_termios':
drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c:578:12: error: implicit declaration of function
'devm_get_gpiod_from_child' [-Werror=implicit-functio
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c: In function '_gpiochip_irqchip_add':
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1622:62: error: macro "WARN_ON" passed 3 arguments
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c: In function '_gpiochip_irqchip_add':
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1622:62: error: macro "WARN_ON" passed 3 arguments, but
takes just 1
"%s: Ignoring %d default trig
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-f7188x.c: In function 'f7188x_gpio_set_single_ended':
drivers/gpio/gpio-f7188x.c:331:26: error: implicit declaration of function
'gpio_data_mode' [-Werror=implicit-function-d
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c: In function 'ppc4xx_gpio_set':
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c:93:26: error: unused variable '
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c: In function 'ppc4xx_gpio_set':
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c:93:26: error: unused variable 'mm_gc'
[-Werror=unused-variable]
struct of_mm_gpio_chi
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c: In function 'tps65218_gpio_request':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c:74:26: error: 'struct gpio
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c: In function 'tps65218_gpio_request':
drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c:74:26: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member
named 'desc'
unsigned long flags = gc->desc[off
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>> I have used the gpio tree from next-20160128 for today.
>
> I am still getting this error.
Sorry for slow attendance :(
Fixed it now, I hope.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Hi Linus,
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:45:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c: In function 'mpc8xxx_gpio_save_regs':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c:57:21: error: implicit de
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c: In function 'mpc8xxx_gpio_save_regs':
drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c:57:21: error: implicit declaration of function
'in_be32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Hi Linus,
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:58:34 +0100 Linus Walleij
wrote:
>
> Pushed now, I was waiting for the autobuilders to munch it first.
> Sorry for the delay :(
No worries, I have refetched it.
BTW, its good that the autobuilders have had a go at it :-)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:08:58 +0100 Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Robert Jarzmik
>> wrote:
>> > Stephen Rothwell writes:
>> >
>> >> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without
>>
Hi Linus,
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:08:58 +0100 Linus Walleij
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Robert Jarzmik
> wrote:
> > Stephen Rothwell writes:
> >
> >> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without
> >> CONFIG_OF) failed like this:
> >>
> >> drivers/gpio/g
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without
>> CONFIG_OF) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c: In function 'pxa_gpio_probe':
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c:648:12
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without
> CONFIG_OF) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c: In function 'pxa_gpio_probe':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c:648:12: error: 'pxa_irq_domain_ops' undeclared (first
> use in this fun
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without
CONFIG_OF) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c: In function 'pxa_gpio_probe':
drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c:648:12: error: 'pxa_irq_domain_ops' undeclared (first
use in this function)
Caused by commit
384ca3c6a28d
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:37:55 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c: In functio
Hi Linus,
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:37:55 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c: In function 'nsp_gpio_probe':
> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c:699:4: e
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 9:08 AM
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Yendapally Reddy
Dhananjaya Reddy
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c: In function 'nsp_gpio_probe':
drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c:699:4: error: implicit declaration of
function 'set_irq_flags' [-Werror=implicit
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/broonie/next/x86_64_allmodconfig'
/home/broonie/next/next/sound/soc/soc-ac97.c: In function
'snd_soc_ac97_init_gpio':
/home/broonie/next/next/sound/soc/soc-ac97.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c: In function 'etraxfs_gpio_irq_request_resources':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c:300:2: error: 'ret' undeclare
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c: In function 'etraxfs_gpio_irq_request_resources':
drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c:300:2: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this
function)
ret = gpiochip_lock_as_
Em Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:23:26 +0200
Uwe Kleine-König escreveu:
> Hello Linus,
>
> I forgot to add you (and also Stephen) to Cc for my slightly different
> patch. You can find it at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/30908/.
>
> I just sent you and Stephen a bounce if you want to comment.
My pl
Hello Linus,
I forgot to add you (and also Stephen) to Cc for my slightly different
patch. You can find it at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/30908/.
I just sent you and Stephen a bounce if you want to comment.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-Kön
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c: In function 'tc358743_probe_of':
> drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c:1786:22: error: too few argume
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c: In function 'tc358743_probe_of':
drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c:1786:22: error: too few arguments to function
'devm_gpiod_get'
state->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(
Hi Chanwoo,
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:19:12 +0900 Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 08/13/2015 08:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Uwe,
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:16:42 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 08/13/2015 08:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:16:42 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>>> allyesconfig) fai
Hi Uwe,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:16:42 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c:211:25: error: t
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c:211:25: error: too few arguments to function
> 'devm_gpiod_get_optional'
> palmas_usb->
Hi Uwe,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:27:58 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:21:07 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > allyesconfig)
Hi Uwe,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:21:07 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c:211:25: error: t
Hello Stephen,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c:211:25: error: too few arguments to function
> 'devm_gpiod_get_optional'
> palm
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c:211:25: error: too few arguments to function
'devm_gpiod_get_optional'
palmas_usb->id_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "id");
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c: In function 'bcm_acpi_probe':
drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c:429:9: error: too few arguments to function
'devm_gpiod_get'
gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "device-
Hi Dmitry,
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 22:46:52 -0700 Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
>
> Thank you for the patch. I think we actually want GPIOD_OUT_LOW and kill
> the "else" branch altogether, like below.
I will use your patch from today. Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 03:07:41PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c: In function 'elants_i2c_probe':
> drivers/input/touchscreen/el
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c: In function 'elants_i2c_probe':
drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c:1176:19: error: too few arguments to
function 'devm_gpiod_get'
ts->reset_gpio =
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c: In function
'rk808_regulator_dt_parse_pdata':
drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c:543:24: error: too few arguments to
function 'gpiod_get_index'
pdata-
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 04:55:16PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dln2.c: In function 'dln2_gpio_probe':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dln2.c:469:12: error: 'struct gpio_chi
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dln2.c: In function 'dln2_gpio_probe':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dln2.c:469:12: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-dln2.c: In function 'dln2_gpio_probe':
drivers/gpio/gpio-dln2.c:469:12: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member named
'exported'
dln2->gpio.exported = true;
^
Hi Alexandre,
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:10:14 +0900 Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> I have sent a patch to fix this. In the meantime, if the merge
> conflict of the GPIO tree on board-paz00.c is solved by taking the
> GPIO version, there is no build error.
>
> There are a few important patches pending
I have sent a patch to fix this. In the meantime, if the merge
conflict of the GPIO tree on board-paz00.c is solved by taking the
GPIO version, there is no build error.
There are a few important patches pending in the GPIO tree that should
undergo testing - Stephen, do you think you could resolve
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:31:53AM +0200, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c:20:0:
> include/linu
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c:20:0:
include/linux/gpio/machine.h:24:2: error: unknown type name 'u16'
u16 chip_hwnum;
^
include/linux/gpio/machine.h:31:19: erro
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/mfd/stmpe.c: In function 'stmpe_irq_init':
> drivers/mfd/stmpe.c:1000:15: error: 'struct stmpe' has no member named
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/mfd/stmpe.c: In function 'stmpe_irq_init':
drivers/mfd/stmpe.c:1000:15: error: 'struct stmpe' has no member named
'irq_base'
base = stmpe->irq_base;
^
Caused by com
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c: In function 'mcp23s08_irq_setup':
drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c:482:46: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member
named 'of_node'
mcp->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c: In function 'pcf857x_irq_domain_map':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c:206:2: error: implicit declaration of fun
Hi Linus,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c: In function 'pcf857x_irq_domain_map':
drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c:206:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'set_irq_flags' [-Werror=implicit-function-declara
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:45:13 +1100, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c: In function 'stmpe_gpio_irq_init':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c:313:23: error: 'struct gpio_ch
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c: In function 'stmpe_gpio_irq_init':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c:313:23: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member
Hi Grant,
After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c: In function 'stmpe_gpio_irq_init':
drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c:313:23: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member named
'of_node'
drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c:316:61: error:
78 matches
Mail list logo