On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 09:58:58AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 18:11:03 +0200 David Sterba wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 08:59:36AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > After merging the btrfs-kdave tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > ppc6
Hi David,
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 18:11:03 +0200 David Sterba wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 08:59:36AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > After merging the btrfs-kdave tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > fs/btrfs/print-tree.c: In function 'prin
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 08:59:36AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the btrfs-kdave tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/btrfs/print-tree.c: In function 'print_extent_item':
> fs/btrfs/print-tree.c:56:3: error: implicit declaration of fu
Hi all,
After merging the btrfs-kdave tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/btrfs/print-tree.c: In function 'print_extent_item':
fs/btrfs/print-tree.c:56:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'btrfs_print_v0_err'; did you mean 'btrfs_print_tree'?
[-W
Hi David,
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 00:48:46 +0100 David Sterba wrote:
>
> Right, I had fixed it in my local branch but did not push the update,
> sorry. Current for-next, top commit 993b08a92e32 builds fine.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 10:40:57AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> [Seems I somehow failed to actually send the following message a couple
> of days ago, sorry.]
>
> After merging the btrfs-kdave tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/b
Hi David,
[Seems I somehow failed to actually send the following message a couple
of days ago, sorry.]
After merging the btrfs-kdave tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c:33:10: fatal error: hash.h: No such file or directory
#include
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:22:53AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> After merging the btrfs-kdave tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/ntfs/attrib.c: In function 'ntfs_attr_set':
> fs/ntfs/attrib.c:2549:35: error: implicit declaration of fu
Hi David,
After merging the btrfs-kdave tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
fs/ntfs/attrib.c: In function 'ntfs_attr_set':
fs/ntfs/attrib.c:2549:35: error: implicit declaration of function
'inode_to_bdi' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
balance_dirty_
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:39:04AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> After merging the btrfs-kdave tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/btrfs/reada.c:326:29: error: invalid storage class for function
> 'reada_find_extent'
> static
Hi David,
After merging the btrfs-kdave tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/btrfs/reada.c:326:29: error: invalid storage class for function
'reada_find_extent'
static struct reada_extent *reada_find_extent(struct btrfs_root *root,
11 matches
Mail list logo
