On 09/24/2012 09:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi Randy,
>>
>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:39:05 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/24/2012 07:53 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
Today was a train wreck, with lots of new conflic
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> This build still fails on linux-next of 20121001 when
> VIRTIO is not enabled.
I meant to send this to 3.6-rc, but now that 3.6 is out, I've pushed
it on remoteproc's for-next branch and will send it to 3.7.
It will show up on linux-next the
On 09/24/2012 03:10 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/24/2012 07:53 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today was a train wreck, with lots of new conflicts across several trees
>> and a few build failures as well.
>>
>> Changes since 201209021:
>>
>
This build still fails on linux-nex
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> on x86_64:
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `rproc_virtio_finalize_features':
> remoteproc_virtio.c:(.text+0x2f9a02): undefined reference to
> `vring_transport_features'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `rproc_virtio_del_vqs':
> remotepr
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 09:23:25PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 09/24/2012 07:53 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Today was a train wreck, with lots of new conflicts across several trees
> > > and a few buil
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/24/2012 07:53 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today was a train wreck, with lots of new conflicts across several trees
> > and a few build failures as well.
> >
> > Changes since 201209021:
> >
>
>
>
> on i386:
On 09/24/2012 07:53 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today was a train wreck, with lots of new conflicts across several trees
> and a few build failures as well.
>
> Changes since 201209021:
>
on x86_64:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `rproc_virtio_finalize_features':
remoteproc_vi
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:39:05 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> On 09/24/2012 07:53 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> > Today was a train wreck, with lots of new conflicts across several trees
>> > and a few build failures as w
On 09/24/2012 10:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:39:05 -0700 Randy Dunlap
> wrote:
>>
>> On 09/24/2012 07:53 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>>> Today was a train wreck, with lots of new conflicts across
>>> several trees and a few build failures as well.
>>
Hi Randy,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:39:05 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 09/24/2012 07:53 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Today was a train wreck, with lots of new conflicts across several trees
> > and a few build failures as well.
>
> I agree. I mostly get this:
>
> drivers/Kconfig:157: ca
On 09/24/2012 07:53 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today was a train wreck, with lots of new conflicts across several trees
> and a few build failures as well.
I agree. I mostly get this:
drivers/Kconfig:157: can't open file "drivers/irqchip/Kconfig"
i.e., no such file.
How does
Hi all,
Today was a train wreck, with lots of new conflicts across several trees
and a few build failures as well.
Changes since 201209021:
The vfs tree conflicts against Linus' tree.
The drm tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch.
The sound and sound-asoc trees gain
12 matches
Mail list logo
