Hi all,
Changes since 20180906:
Dropped trees: xarray, ida (temporarily)
The vfs tree still had its build failures for which I disabled some
sample programs.
The net-next tree still had its build failure for which I reverted
a commit.
The bfp-next tree gained a conflict against the above rever
On 09/06/17 23:24, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please do not add any v4.15 related material to your linux-next
> included branches until after v4.14-rc1 has been released.
>
> Changes since 20170906:
>
on i386:
CONFIG_STM32_ADC_CORE=y
CONFIG_STM32_ADC=y
CONFIG_IIO_STM32_LPTIMER_TRIGG
Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.15 related material to your linux-next
included branches until after v4.14-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20170906:
The devicetree tree gained conflicts against Linus' and the sound trees.
The akpm-current tree lost its build failure but regained another f
On 09/07/16 19:58, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:55:47 -0700
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> Yes, that works. Thanks.
>>
>> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap
>
> Hmm, would "Tested-by" be a more appropriate tag?
I considered that. Either is OK with me.
--
~Randy
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 07:42:01 +1000
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Link:
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160907175258.1f17a...@canb.auug.org.au
>
> That is not the reporting email ... Randy's was a reply to that one
> with message id
> "".
>
Strange, I wonder how I got that email. I cut an
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:55:47 -0700
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Yes, that works. Thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap
Hmm, would "Tested-by" be a more appropriate tag?
-- Steve
Hi Steven,
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:38:10 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> commit 64cfdb9788bf3fb2bf6c30701fc3644f25e76df2
> Author: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)
> Date: Wed Sep 7 12:45:09 2016 -0400
>
> tracing: Have max_latency be defined for HWLAT_TRACER as well
>
> The hwlat tracer u
On 09/07/16 12:38, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:48:38 -0400
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
>> Will send another one soon.
>
> What about this?
>
> -- Steve
>
> commit 64cfdb9788bf3fb2bf6c30701fc3644f25e76df2
> Author: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)
> Date: Wed Sep 7 12:45:09 2016 -040
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:48:38 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Will send another one soon.
What about this?
-- Steve
commit 64cfdb9788bf3fb2bf6c30701fc3644f25e76df2
Author: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)
Date: Wed Sep 7 12:45:09 2016 -0400
tracing: Have max_latency be defined for HWLAT_TRACER as
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 11:34:24 -0700
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hm, now I get:
>
> ../kernel/trace/trace.c: In function 'tracing_set_tracer':
> ../kernel/trace/trace.c:4850:3: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'free_snapshot' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>free_snapshot(tr);
>
On 09/07/16 09:44, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Below is the fix. I'll have to add it.
>
> -- Steve
>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> index 72c07c2ffd79..d9000a81960e 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ co
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 09:37:00 -0700
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/07/16 00:52, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20160906:
> >
>
> on i386:
>
> ../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c: In function 'get_sample':
> ../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:258:18: error: 'struct trace_array' ha
On 09/07/16 00:52, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20160906:
>
on i386:
../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c: In function 'get_sample':
../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:258:18: error: 'struct trace_array' has no member
named 'max_latency'
if (sample > tr->max_latency)
Hi all,
Changes since 20160906:
The btrfs-kdave tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20160906.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The drm-intel tree gained conflicts against the drm tree.
The kbuild tree still had its build warnings for PowerPC, fo
14 matches
Mail list logo
