linux-next: Tree for Sep 5

2018-09-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180904: Dropped trees: xarray, ida (temporarily) The net-next tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The devicetree tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1853 2252 files changed, 6

linux-next: Tree for Sep 5

2017-09-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.15 related material to your linux-next included branches until after v4.14-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20170904: The nvdimm tree lost its build failure. The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree and still had its build failure fo

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 5 (kernel/events/core.c)

2016-09-05 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 09/05/16 02:25, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160825: > on i386 or x86_64: when CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING is not enabled: ../kernel/events/core.c: In function 'perf_event_alloc': ../kernel/events/core.c:9106:27: error: 'bpf_overflow_handler' undeclared (first use in this

linux-next: Tree for Sep 5

2016-09-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160825: The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The samsung-krzk tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The btrfs-kdave tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The net-next tree gained

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 5: build error due to 'ath5k: added debugfs file for dumping eeprom'

2014-09-06 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > I see the following build error on linux-next-20140905. > > Guenter > > --- > > Building alpha:allmodconfig ... failed > Building sparc64:allmodconfig ... failed > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/debug.c: In function 'open_file_eeprom': > dri

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 5: build failure due to 'mm: introduce dump_vma'

2014-09-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 09/06/2014 08:47 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: On 09/06/2014 11:43 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: I see the following build failure in next-20140905. Guenter Hey Guenter, Apologies for that. There is already a fix in -mm: No worries. http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/introduce-dump_

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 5: build failure due to 'mm: introduce dump_vma'

2014-09-06 Thread Sasha Levin
On 09/06/2014 11:43 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > I see the following build failure in next-20140905. > > Guenter Hey Guenter, Apologies for that. There is already a fix in -mm: http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/introduce-dump_vma-fix-2.patch So -next would be fixed once -mm is pul

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 5: build failure due to 'mm: introduce dump_vma'

2014-09-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 08:43:09AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > I see the following build failure in next-20140905. > > Guenter > > --- > > Building tile:tilegx_defconfig ... failed Also: Building powerpc:allmodconfig ... failed Building powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig ... failed with the same erro

linux-next: Tree for Sep 5: build failure due to 'mm: introduce dump_vma'

2014-09-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
I see the following build failure in next-20140905. Guenter --- Building tile:tilegx_defconfig ... failed -- Error log: mm/page_alloc.c: In function 'dump_vma': mm/page_alloc.c:6742:46: error: 'pgprot_t' has no member named 'pgprot' make[1]: *** [mm/page_alloc.o] Error 1 make[1]: ***

linux-next: Tree for Sep 5: build error due to 'ath5k: added debugfs file for dumping eeprom'

2014-09-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
I see the following build error on linux-next-20140905. Guenter --- Building alpha:allmodconfig ... failed Building sparc64:allmodconfig ... failed drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/debug.c: In function 'open_file_eeprom': drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/debug.c:933:2: error: implicit decla

linux-next: Tree for Sep 5

2014-09-05 Thread Mark Brown
Changes since 20140904: None. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3727 3261 files changed, 133225 insertions(+), 99782 deletions(-) I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git . If you are tracking the linux-next tree usi

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 5 (netfilter: xt_socket.c)

2013-09-05 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 09/05/13 11:38, David Miller wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap > Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 10:37:04 -0700 > >> On 09/05/13 02:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Please do not add any code for v3.13 to your linux-next included branches >>> until after v3.12-rc1 is released. >>> >>> Changes

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 5 (netfilter: xt_socket.c)

2013-09-05 Thread David Miller
From: Randy Dunlap Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 10:37:04 -0700 > On 09/05/13 02:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Please do not add any code for v3.13 to your linux-next included branches >> until after v3.12-rc1 is released. >> >> Changes since 20130904: >> > > on x86_64: > > when CONF

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 5 (netfilter: xt_socket.c)

2013-09-05 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 09/05/13 02:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add any code for v3.13 to your linux-next included branches > until after v3.12-rc1 is released. > > Changes since 20130904: > on x86_64: when CONFIG_IPV6=m and CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_SOCKET=y: net/built-in.o: In functi

linux-next: Tree for Sep 5

2013-09-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any code for v3.13 to your linux-next included branches until after v3.12-rc1 is released. Changes since 20130904: The arm tree lost its build failure. The h8300-remove tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The vfs tree gained conflicts against the aio-direct a