Hi all,
Changes since 20200929:
The vfs tree still had its build failure.
The net-next tree still had its build failure and it also gained a
conflict against the net tree.
The bpf-next tree gained a conflict against the bpf tree.
The kvm-arm tree gained a conflict against the arm64 tree.
Non-
Hi all,
Changes since 20190926:
The powerpc tree (well, Linus' tree really) gained a build failure for
which I applied a patch.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 462
574 files changed, 9710 insertions(+), 4176 deletions(-)
Hi all,
There will be no linux-next release on Monday.
Changes since 20160929:
The tty tree gained conflicts against the arm64, pm and v4l-dvb trees
and gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the userns tree.
Non-merge commits (rel
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 02:54:58PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Sudip Mukherjee
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:12:48PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Changes since 20150929:
> >
> > i386 allmodconfig fails with:
> > ERROR: "__
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Sudip Mukherjee
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:12:48PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20150929:
>
> i386 allmodconfig fails with:
> ERROR: "__umoddi3" [drivers/mtd/devices/mtdram.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "__moddi3" [drivers/mtd/d
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:12:48PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150929:
i386 allmodconfig fails with:
ERROR: "__umoddi3" [drivers/mtd/devices/mtdram.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "__moddi3" [drivers/mtd/devices/mtdram.ko] undefined!
arm allmodconfig fails with:
ERROR: "__
Hi all,
Changes since 20150929:
I have added a final powerpc pseries_le_defconfig build.
I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been
rebased onto linux-next again :-(
The l2-mtd tree gained a build failure for which I reverted 2 commits.
The drm-intel tree gained a
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 30.09.2014 20:50, schrieb Randy Dunlap:
>> On 09/30/14 03:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Changes since 20140926:
>>>
>>
>> uml defconfig on i386 and x86_64:
>>
>> In file included from ../arch/x86/um/asm/processor.h:31:0,
>>
Am 30.09.2014 20:50, schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> On 09/30/14 03:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20140926:
>>
>
> uml defconfig on i386 and x86_64:
>
> In file included from ../arch/x86/um/asm/processor.h:31:0,
> from ../arch/um/include/asm/uaccess.h:16,
>
On 09/30/14 03:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20140926:
>
uml defconfig on i386 and x86_64:
In file included from ../arch/x86/um/asm/processor.h:31:0,
from ../arch/um/include/asm/uaccess.h:16,
from ../arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h:1
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 08:12:44PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20140926:
>
> The arm-soc tree still had its build failure for which I reverted
> 5 commits.
>
> The asm-generic tree lost its build failure.
>
> The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net tree
Hi all,
Changes since 20140926:
The arm-soc tree still had its build failure for which I reverted
5 commits.
The asm-generic tree lost its build failure.
The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net tree and a build
failure so I used the version from next-20140926.
The battery tree gaine
Hi Thierry, Mark,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:20:34 +0200 Thierry Reding
wrote:
>
> As I'm sure is the case for many of us, I've become very dependent upon
> the linux-next tree. So everytime Stephen goes on vacation I break out
> in a cold sweat.
>
> Here's my attempt at providing temporary service
Hi all,
As I'm sure is the case for many of us, I've become very dependent upon
the linux-next tree. So everytime Stephen goes on vacation I break out
in a cold sweat.
Here's my attempt at providing temporary service until Stephen is back.
The result is likely a lot worse than what you're used to
14 matches
Mail list logo
