Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 17 (net/ipv4/devinet.c)

On 9/18/20 1:25 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > Le 17/09/2020 à 22:45, Randy Dunlap a écrit : >> On 9/17/20 3:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20200916: >>> >> >> >> Maybe some older versions of gcc just can't handle IS_ENABLED() inside an >> if (expression) very well.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 17 (net/ipv4/devinet.c)

Hi Randy, On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:45:52 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Maybe some older versions of gcc just can't handle IS_ENABLED() inside an > if (expression) very well. > > > gcc --version > gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 > > This patch: > > commit 9efd6a3cecdde984d67e63d17fe6af53c7c50968 > Autho

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 17 (net/ipv4/devinet.c)

Le 17/09/2020 à 22:45, Randy Dunlap a écrit : > On 9/17/20 3:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20200916: >> > > > Maybe some older versions of gcc just can't handle IS_ENABLED() inside an > if (expression) very well. > >> gcc --version > gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 I tried

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 17 (netdevice.h: net_has_fallback_tunnels when SYSCTL is not set)

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 1:33 PM Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 9/17/20 3:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20200916: > > > > I am seeing build errors when CONFIG_SYSCTL is not set: > > ld: net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.o: in function `ip_tunnel_init_net': > ip_tunnel.c:(.text+0x2ea

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 17 (net/ipv4/devinet.c)

On 9/17/20 3:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200916: > Maybe some older versions of gcc just can't handle IS_ENABLED() inside an if (expression) very well. > gcc --version gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 This patch: commit 9efd6a3cecdde984d67e63d17fe6af53c7c50968 Author:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 17 (netdevice.h: net_has_fallback_tunnels when SYSCTL is not set)

On 9/17/20 3:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200916: > I am seeing build errors when CONFIG_SYSCTL is not set: ld: net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.o: in function `ip_tunnel_init_net': ip_tunnel.c:(.text+0x2ea0): undefined reference to `sysctl_fb_tunnels_only_for_init_net' ld: n

linux-next: Tree for Sep 17

Hi all, Changes since 20200916: Removed tree: s390-setfs (consoldiated into the s390 tree) The jc_docs tree gained a conflict against the spdx tree. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. I added a supplied fix to the tip tree. The rcu tree gained a build failure so I used

linux-next: Tree for Sep 17

Hi all, Changes since 20190916: The sound-current tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit (this had actually been previously worked around with a patch against the tip tree but the issue got moved forward by Takashi's workflow for sending pull requests). The OMAP tree gained a

linux-next: Tree for Sep 17

Hi all, Changes since 20150916: Unropped tree: akpm-current I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been rebased onto something very old :-( The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The net-next tree lost its build failure. The bluetooth tree still

linux-next: Tree for Sep 17

Hi all, Changes since 20140916: New tree: mailbox The net tree lost its build failure but gained another so I used the version from next-20140915. I also had to use the version of the ipsec tree from next-20140916 since today's version is based on the net tree that contains errors. The v4l-dvb

linux-next: Tree for Sep 17

Hi all, Changes since 20130916: *crickets* I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git (patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/ ). If you