Hi all,
Changes since 20200915:
New tree: s390-setfs
The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the dma-mapping tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7322
8259 files changed, 258836 insertions(+), 146908 deletions(-)
--
On 9/18/19 3:03 AM, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 07:05:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote...
>
>> * Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/17/19 6:38 AM, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:52:42 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote...
> * Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 07:05:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote...
> * Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> On 9/17/19 6:38 AM, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:52:42 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote...
>> >
>> >> * Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On 9/16/19 3:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> >
* Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/17/19 6:38 AM, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:52:42 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote...
> >
> >> * Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 9/16/19 3:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20190915:
>
> >>>
> >>> on x
On 9/17/19 6:38 AM, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:52:42 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote...
>
>> * Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/16/19 3:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20190915:
>>>
>>> on x86_64:
>>>
>>> when CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set:
>
>
On 9/17/19 6:50 AM, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 14:38:28 +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote...
>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:52:42 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote...
>>
>>> * Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>
On 9/16/19 3:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:52:42 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote...
> * Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> On 9/16/19 3:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Changes since 20190915:
>> >
>>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>> when CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set:
Hi Randy,
thanks for the report.
>> CC kernel/s
* Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/16/19 3:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20190915:
> >
>
> on x86_64:
>
> when CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set:
>
> CC kernel/sched/core.o
> ../kernel/sched/core.c: In function ‘uclamp_update_active_tasks’:
> ../kernel/sched/core.c:10
On 9/16/19 3:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20190915:
>
on x86_64:
when CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set:
CC kernel/sched/core.o
../kernel/sched/core.c: In function ‘uclamp_update_active_tasks’:
../kernel/sched/core.c:1081:23: error: storage size of ‘it’ isn’t known
str
Hi all,
Changes since 20190915:
The arm64 tree acquired a conflict with the compiler-attributes tree.
The ia64 tree acquired a conflict with the dma-mapping tree.
The vfs tree acquired a conflict with the ubifds tree.
A workaround was applied for a merge issue between the drm and kbuild
trees
On 09/15/16 21:45, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20160915:
>
on i386:
when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP and CONFIG_SUSPEND are not enabled:
../drivers/spi/spi-bcm-qspi.c:1300:13: error: 'bcm_qspi_suspend' undeclared
here (not in a function)
.suspend = bcm_qspi_suspend,
Hi all,
Changes since 20160915:
New tree: kgdb
The kbuild tree still had its build failure and warnings for PowerPC,
for which I applied a couple of patches
The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The drm-msm tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The block tree gained
Hi all,
Changes since 20150915:
Dropped tree: akpm-current (build conflict)
I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been
rebased onto something very old :-(
The net-next tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch.
The bluetooth tree still had its bu
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:56:12PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20140912:
>
> The net tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20140915.
>
> The nfs tree lost its build failure.
>
> The v4l-dvb tree still had its build failure so I used the ver
Hi all,
Changes since 20140912:
The net tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20140915.
The nfs tree lost its build failure.
The v4l-dvb tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20140908.
The slave-dma tree gained a build faiure so I used the versi
Hi all,
Please do not add any code for v3.13 to your linux-next included branches
until after v3.12-rc1 is released.
Changes since 20130913:
The h8300-remove tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The aio-direct tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
-
16 matches
Mail list logo
