linux-next: Tree for Oct 8

2020-10-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20201007: The risc-v tree gained a conflict against the risc-v-fixes tree. The xarray tree gaeind 2 build failure for which I added some fixes. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 12803 12585 files changed, 699779 insertions(+), 275718 deletions(-) -

linux-next: Tree for Oct 8

2019-10-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20191004: My fixes tree is empty again. The hid tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree gained a semantic conflict against the net tree. The bpf-next tree gained a conflict against the bpf tree. The drm-misc tree gained a semantic conflict against the v4l-dvb tree

linux-next: Tree for Oct 8

2018-10-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20181005: New tree: compiler-attributes The nfsd tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20181004. The rdma tree gained a conflict against the vfs tree. The crypto tree gained a conflict against the compiler-attributes tree and a build failure, so

linux-next: Tree for Oct 8

2015-10-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20151007: Linus' tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch. I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been rebased onto linux-next again :-( The battery tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20150925.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 8 (media/usb/gspca)

2014-10-09 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:26:10 +0200 Paul Bolle escreveu: > On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 07:30 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Thu, 09 Oct 2014 08:45:28 +0200 > > Paul Bolle escreveu: > > > The above discussion meanders a bit, and I just stumbled onto it, but > > > would > > > #if IS_BUILT

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 8 (media/usb/gspca)

2014-10-09 Thread Paul Bolle
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 07:30 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Thu, 09 Oct 2014 08:45:28 +0200 > Paul Bolle escreveu: > > The above discussion meanders a bit, and I just stumbled onto it, but > > would > > #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_INPUT) || (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_INPUT) && > > defined(MODULE))

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 8 (media/usb/gspca)

2014-10-09 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Thu, 09 Oct 2014 08:45:28 +0200 Paul Bolle escreveu: > On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 22:50 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:53:33 -0700 > > Randy Dunlap escreveu: > > > On 10/08/14 11:31, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > From gpsca's PoV, IMHO, it should be fine to d

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 8 (media/usb/gspca)

2014-10-08 Thread Paul Bolle
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 22:50 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:53:33 -0700 > Randy Dunlap escreveu: > > On 10/08/14 11:31, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > From gpsca's PoV, IMHO, it should be fine to disable the webcam buttons if > > > the webcam was compiled as builti

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 8 (media/usb/gspca)

2014-10-08 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:53:33 -0700 Randy Dunlap escreveu: > On 10/08/14 11:31, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:13:39 -0700 > > Randy Dunlap escreveu: > > > >> On 10/07/14 23:49, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Please do not add any material intended for

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 8 (media/usb/gspca)

2014-10-08 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/08/14 11:31, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:13:39 -0700 > Randy Dunlap escreveu: > >> On 10/07/14 23:49, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Please do not add any material intended for v3.19 to you linux-next >>> included trees until after v3.18-rc1 has been r

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 8 (media/usb/gspca)

2014-10-08 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:13:39 -0700 Randy Dunlap escreveu: > On 10/07/14 23:49, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please do not add any material intended for v3.19 to you linux-next > > included trees until after v3.18-rc1 has been released. > > > > Changes since 20141007: > > > > I

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 8 (media/usb/gspca)

2014-10-08 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/07/14 23:49, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add any material intended for v3.19 to you linux-next > included trees until after v3.18-rc1 has been released. > > Changes since 20141007: > I saw these build errors in gspca when CONFIG_INPUT=m but the gspca sub-drivers ar

linux-next: Tree for Oct 8

2014-10-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any material intended for v3.19 to you linux-next included trees until after v3.18-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20141007: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 9651 8214 files changed, 378909 insertions(+), 275679 deletions(-) --

linux-next: Tree for Oct 8

2013-10-08 Thread Thierry Reding
Hi all, I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the repository below: git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git A next-20131008 tag is also provided for convenience. No new conflicts today. x86, ARM, PowerPC and MIPS default configurations build fine. There

linux-next: Tree for Oct 8

2012-10-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Do not add stuff destined for v3.8 to your linux-next included branches until after v3.7-rc1 is released. Changes since 201201005: New tree: asm-generic Conflicts are migrating as trees are merged by Linus. The ia64 tree gained a conflict against the asm-generic tree. The acpi tree ga