Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (drivers/idle/intel_idle.c)

2020-11-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/30/20 3:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 08:36:17AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Randy, >> >> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 07:57:32 -0800 Randy Dunlap >> wrote: >>> >>> On 11/27/20 1:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20201126: >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (parisc: signal flags)

2020-11-30 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi all, > > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:43:07 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> On 11/27/20 1:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Changes since 20201126: >> > >> >> on parisc, _SA_SIGGFAULT is undefined and causing build errors. >> >> commit 23acdc76f1

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (drivers/idle/intel_idle.c)

2020-11-30 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 08:36:17AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Randy, > > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 07:57:32 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > On 11/27/20 1:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20201126: > > > > > > > (This looks strange to me.) > > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (drivers/idle/intel_idle.c)

2020-11-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/27/20 1:36 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Randy, > > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 07:57:32 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> On 11/27/20 1:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20201126: >>> >> >> (This looks strange to me.) >> >> >> on i386 or x86_64: >> >> # CONFIG_AC

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (parisc: signal flags)

2020-11-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:43:07 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 11/27/20 1:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20201126: > > > > on parisc, _SA_SIGGFAULT is undefined and causing build errors. > > commit 23acdc76f1798b090bb9dcc90671cd29d929834e > Author: P

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (drivers/idle/intel_idle.c)

2020-11-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Randy, On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 07:57:32 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 11/27/20 1:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20201126: > > > > (This looks strange to me.) > > > on i386 or x86_64: > > # CONFIG_ACPI is not set > > ../drivers/idle/intel_idle.c: In fun

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (parisc: signal flags)

2020-11-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
[adding Eric] On 11/27/20 10:43 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 11/27/20 1:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20201126: >> > > on parisc, _SA_SIGGFAULT is undefined and causing build errors. > > commit 23acdc76f1798b090bb9dcc90671cd29d929834e > Author: Peter Collingbourne

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (parisc: signal flags)

2020-11-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/27/20 1:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20201126: > on parisc, _SA_SIGGFAULT is undefined and causing build errors. commit 23acdc76f1798b090bb9dcc90671cd29d929834e Author: Peter Collingbourne Date: Thu Nov 12 18:53:34 2020 -0800 signal: clear non-uapi fl

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (drivers/idle/intel_idle.c)

2020-11-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/27/20 1:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20201126: > (This looks strange to me.) on i386 or x86_64: # CONFIG_ACPI is not set ../drivers/idle/intel_idle.c: In function ‘intel_idle_init_cstates_icpu’: ../drivers/idle/intel_idle.c:1510:7: error: implicit declarat

linux-next: Tree for Nov 27

2020-11-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20201126: The dma-mapping tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. The tip tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. The regmap tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The akpm-current tree gained conflicts against the ris

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (scsi/aha1542)

2018-11-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 20:14:58 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 11/26/18 8:25 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20181126: > > > > on i386: > > ERROR: "__udivdi3" [drivers/scsi/aha1542.ko] undefined! > > somewhere in aha1542_interrupt() according to objdump

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (net/ipv4/af_inet.c)

2018-11-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/26/18 8:25 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20181126: > as reported for linux-next-20181109: (see https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/499e91d0-7349-641f-9826-753571317...@infradead.org/) when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled: ld: net/ipv4/af_inet.o: in function `inet_init':

linux-next: Tree for Nov 27

2018-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20181126: The selinux tree gained a conflict against the vfs tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4747 4948 files changed, 246866 insertions(+), 147684 deletions(-) I have created

linux-next: Tree for Nov 27

2017-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20171124: The net tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The watchdog tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The ipmi tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 619 788 files changed, 13696 insertions(+), 6589 delet

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (mm stuff)

2015-11-27 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 01:16:40PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 06:17:39PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Cc Vladimir, Kirill, Andrew > > > > On (11/27/15 18:10), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > On (11/26/15 23:04), Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > > > on i386: >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (mm stuff)

2015-11-27 Thread Vladimir Davydov
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 06:17:39PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Cc Vladimir, Kirill, Andrew > > On (11/27/15 18:10), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > On (11/26/15 23:04), Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > on i386: > > > > > > mm/built-in.o: In function `page_referenced_one': > > > rmap.c:(.text

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (mm stuff)

2015-11-27 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
Cc Vladimir, Kirill, Andrew On (11/27/15 18:10), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (11/26/15 23:04), Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > on i386: > > > > mm/built-in.o: In function `page_referenced_one': > > rmap.c:(.text+0x362a2): undefined reference to `pmdp_clear_flush_young' > > mm/built-in.o: In funct

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (mm stuff)

2015-11-27 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (11/26/15 23:04), Randy Dunlap wrote: > > on i386: > > mm/built-in.o: In function `page_referenced_one': > rmap.c:(.text+0x362a2): undefined reference to `pmdp_clear_flush_young' > mm/built-in.o: In function `page_idle_clear_pte_refs_one': > page_idle.c:(.text+0x4b2b8): undefined reference to

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (mm stuff)

2015-11-26 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/26/15 21:05, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Reminder: there will be no linux-next release next week (Nov 30 - Dec 4). > > Changes since 20151126: > on i386: mm/built-in.o: In function `page_referenced_one': rmap.c:(.text+0x362a2): undefined reference to `pmdp_clear_flush_young' mm

linux-next: Tree for Nov 27

2015-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Reminder: there will be no linux-next release next week (Nov 30 - Dec 4). Changes since 20151126: The modules tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20151126. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2942 3585 files changed, 110232 insertions(+), 42648 deletion

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27

2014-11-27 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:02:51PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20141126: > > The block tree gained a conflict against the ext4 tree. > > The omap_dss2 tree lost its build failure. > > The irqchip tree gained a conflict against the mips tree. > > The staging tree

linux-next: Tree for Nov 27

2014-11-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20141126: The block tree gained a conflict against the ext4 tree. The omap_dss2 tree lost its build failure. The irqchip tree gained a conflict against the mips tree. The staging tree gained conflicts against the kbuild and vfs trees. The akpm tree lost a patch that turn

linux-next: Tree for Nov 27

2013-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20131126: My fixes tree contains: Revert "powerpc: Add CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN kernel config option." The staging tree gained conflicts against the staging.current tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1374 1681 files changed, 66133 insertions(+), 7

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c)

2012-11-27 Thread Kyungmin Park
Hi, It's fixed already and you will check it at Nov 28 tree http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg56830.html Thank you, Kyungmin Park On 11/28/12, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > [Just adding some cc's] > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:32:15 -0800 Randy Dunlap > wrote: >> >> On 11/26/2012 10:25 PM,

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (file notify)

2012-11-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
[Just adding some more cc's] On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:43:43 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 11/26/2012 10:25 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20121126: > > > > > when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled (also seen in mmotm): > > fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c:436

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (file notify)

2012-11-27 Thread Eric Paris
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 08:43 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 11/26/2012 10:25 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20121126: > > > > > when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled (also seen in mmotm): > > fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c:436:17: error: 'fanotify_show_fdinfo

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c)

2012-11-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/26/2012 10:25 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20121126: > on i386: drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c:743:16: error: 'vb2_dc_get_dmabuf' undeclared here (not in a function) Full randconfig file is attached. -- ~Randy # # Automatically generated f

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27 (file notify)

2012-11-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/26/2012 10:25 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20121126: > when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled (also seen in mmotm): fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c:436:17: error: 'fanotify_show_fdinfo' undeclared here (not in a function) fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:333:1

linux-next: Tree for Nov 27

2012-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20121126: New tree: f2fs The powerpc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the infiniband tree. The modules tree still had its build failure so I used the version